Subject:
|
Re: e-commerce (was Technic shuttle etc)
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Thu, 2 Dec 1999 15:24:26 GMT
|
Reply-To:
|
[lpieniazek@]SayNoToSpam[novera.com]
|
Viewed:
|
1450 times
|
| |
|
|
Scott-A wrote:
> That would explain why after that he started up his one per customer rule.
No, it wouldn't. (1) I can't offer an explanation for it either. But I
can stick to what I told you he told me about it. That's the truth.
> A rule which
> I think he has since set aside... or at least for me :-). What is pertinent about the
> length of your conversation with paul? I have spoken to Paul 4 or 5 times, I do not
> think he is capable of have a short conversation.... he is a very pleasant man.
Well, we weren't talking about the weather, we were talking about
substantive issues directly related to how this whole thing unfolded. So
it wasn't that I was claiming to have spent x minutes on the phone, it
was that I was claiming to have spent x minutes talking about this very
topic, the theory of commerce, and buyer mentality. I don't have time
for idle chitchat.
> BTW : What is a billable hour? 9-5? Or is this your consultant rate, either way it is
> quite good... I can only clear a humble $xxx.xx (the tax man is everywhere).
a billable hour is one hour that is billed. Note that I don't get to
keep that, I just get a salary, bonus and options. But billable hours
drive revenue growth which drives stock price which shows up in how much
my options are worth.
1 - oh wait, that was sarcasm, like that "we're a very open and
accepting group" comment, right?
--
Larry Pieniazek larryp@novera.com http://my.voyager.net/lar
- - - Web Application Integration! http://www.novera.com
fund Lugnet(tm): http://www.ebates.com/ ref: lar, 1/2 $$ to lugnet.
NOTE: Soon to be lpieniazek@tsisoft.com :-)
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: e-commerce (was Technic shuttle etc)
|
| (...) That would explain why after that he started up his one per customer rule. A rule which I think he has since set aside... or at least for me :-). What is pertinent about the length of your conversation with paul? I have spoken to Paul 4 or 5 (...) (25 years ago, 2-Dec-99, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
163 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
