To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.off-topic.debateOpen lugnet.off-topic.debate in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Off-Topic / Debate / 17896
17895  |  17897
Subject: 
Re: Freedom of Speech? W sez NO!
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.off-topic.debate
Date: 
Sat, 28 Sep 2002 04:00:05 GMT
Viewed: 
2332 times
  
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Christopher L. Weeks writes:
> In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Mike Petrucelli writes:
> 
> > I guess I was still a little angered by the original subject of
> > this thread that by the time I replyed here I was being a
> > triffle silly in the head. HO HO HEE HEE HA HA.
> 
> So, I seem to have missed the explanation of what exactly angered you about • the
> subject?  I thought it was a good pointer.
> 
> Chris

The fact that someone had their fundamental rights of; freedom of speech,
freedom to peacefully assemble, and freedom to peacefully protest, and there
was no public outcry. There was no major news coverage. It is just disgusting.
Then I followed the tread into the tangent it took and fell into that trap of
posting angry (at essentially something else entirely.)

-Mike Petrucelli



Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Freedom of Speech? W sez NO!
 
(...) So, I seem to have missed the explanation of what exactly angered you about the subject? I thought it was a good pointer. Chris (24 years ago, 27-Sep-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

23 Messages in This Thread:








Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR