Subject:
|
Re: Freedom of Speech? W sez NO!
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Fri, 27 Sep 2002 12:37:35 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
550 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Mike Petrucelli writes:
> Oh for crying out loud. The "popular majority" that Gore supposedly won by • was
> a smaller percentage than Bush won in florida, and well within the margin of
> error. Seriously, does anyone think Gore would be doing much different than
> Bush right now anyway?
I don't see how it matters. I suspect he would have done largely the same
stuff in Afghanistan, but not be threatening Iraq. But really, who can know?
It doesn't need to be that Gore would be doing anything different for us to
think that the election was handled improperly. The coincidences that lead to
Bush's presidency (the roles of this brother's and father's appointees, among
others) are pretty amazing.
> The fact that the whole election was so close is proof
> that most people didn't know which idiot to pick anyway.
Sure! So?
Chris
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Freedom of Speech? W sez NO!
|
| (...) Oh for crying out loud. The "popular majority" that Gore supposedly won by was a smaller percentage than Bush won in florida, and well within the margin of error. Seriously, does anyone think Gore would be doing much different than Bush right (...) (23 years ago, 27-Sep-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
23 Messages in This Thread:
  
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
