Subject:
|
Re: Freedom of Speech? W sez NO!
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Thu, 26 Sep 2002 14:43:22 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
282 times
|
| |
| |
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, David Koudys writes:
> I do hope that you and your fellow citizens do not vote this person in for
> another term. Yeah, you're stuck with 'im for another few years but then
> "vote the incompotent iggit outta office!!--send 'im packing!!"
You aren't listening! We didn't vote him in in the first place. Surely in his
current position, he will be able to rig the vote using even more convincing
tactics.
We'll have him for _at least_ another four years.
(I wonder how much republican money went to Nader last time...)
Chris
|
|
Message has 2 Replies: | | Re: Freedom of Speech? W sez NO!
|
| (...) Depends how he handles Desert Storm II; the first propaganda exercise didn't win a re-election for Dad (though the rest of his cabinet was reinstated in 2000, of course). Here's a puzzle for the Constitutionally-aware among us: Since W was (...) (22 years ago, 26-Sep-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| | | Re: Freedom of Speech? W sez NO!
|
| (...) Whoa, calm your jets there Chris--my whole post was rather in a humourous vein and was light hearted... I know your issues for your fractured voting system. I seem to recall that after the Florida fiasco, that someone went back and recounted, (...) (22 years ago, 26-Sep-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Freedom of Speech? W sez NO!
|
| (...) btw, if I haven't said it yet... I do hope that you and your fellow citizens do not vote this person in for another term. Yeah, you're stuck with 'im for another few years but then "vote the incompotent iggit outta office!!--send 'im (...) (22 years ago, 26-Sep-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
23 Messages in This Thread:
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|