Subject:
|
Re: Freedom of Speech? W sez NO!
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Fri, 27 Sep 2002 22:21:40 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
387 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Mike Petrucelli writes:
> I guess I was still a little angered by the original subject of
> this thread that by the time I replyed here I was being a
> triffle silly in the head. HO HO HEE HEE HA HA.
So, I seem to have missed the explanation of what exactly angered you about the
subject? I thought it was a good pointer.
Chris
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Freedom of Speech? W sez NO!
|
| (...) the (...) The fact that someone had their fundamental rights of; freedom of speech, freedom to peacefully assemble, and freedom to peacefully protest, and there was no public outcry. There was no major news coverage. It is just disgusting. (...) (22 years ago, 28-Sep-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Freedom of Speech? W sez NO!
|
| (...) was (...) Yes it was, but I am rather tired of hearing the Democratic propaganda that Gore won the popular vote. Shouldn't we be worring about the Republican propaganda that Bush was legitimately elected? See there is a paradox if I ever saw (...) (22 years ago, 27-Sep-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
23 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
