To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.off-topic.debateOpen lugnet.off-topic.debate in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Off-Topic / Debate / 17876
17875  |  17877
Subject: 
Re: Freedom of Speech? W sez NO!
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.off-topic.debate
Date: 
Thu, 26 Sep 2002 20:36:41 GMT
Viewed: 
374 times
  
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Dave Schuler writes:

<snip>

A big one, IMO!  I'd love to see someone try to exploit it, but that would
be as good as forfeiting the race, since it would look like something fishy
was going on.  Maybe we could ask Dave K to send a suggestion to the writers
of "West Wing."  8^)

    Dave!

I'll forward it off to one of my WW newsgroups!

By the way, wasn't that 2 hours last night great??

Toby, Josh and Donna lost, trying to get back to DC...

Whoever said that WW uses 'contrived' situations and slants the whatever,
numbers 'n such, was right--the scene in the bar when the father was talking
to Toby about his daughter going to Notre Dame, and how he was very worried
about how he was going to pay for it... I thought it was poignant, but
contrived.

Anwho, still loved it.

Bartlett for America!!!

Dave K.



Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Freedom of Speech? W sez NO!
 
(...) It's a trick of equivocation, I admit. I was making a joke at the expense of "our" "duly" "elected" "President!" (...) A big one, IMO! I'd love to see someone try to exploit it, but that would be as good as forfeiting the race, since it would (...) (22 years ago, 26-Sep-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

23 Messages in This Thread:








Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR