To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.off-topic.debateOpen lugnet.off-topic.debate in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Off-Topic / Debate / *28191 (-40)
  Re: Figure it out
 
(...) No. It is at this time that you should leave Larry's name out of your psychedelic blathering and just STFU already. JOHN (18 years ago, 15-Feb-07, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX) ! 
 
  Re: Figure it out
 
(...) It is at this time we should remember the sacrifices made by Communitity minded hero Lar+ , for in his zeal to make LUGNET a better place, sometimes over did it. Same applies to me as to yourself and a few others. Let us be mindful of brother (...) (18 years ago, 14-Feb-07, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 
  Re: Figure it out
 
(...) --snip-- (...) Thank you for your apology. I too am sorry I sent you the profane image yesterday (and for what it's worth it was never made public and I'd deleted it from online long before I wrote to you). You are however completely wrong (...) (18 years ago, 14-Feb-07, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 
  Re: malicious behavior
 
(...) Ahh in my haste I indeed make aaa huge gramatical error, look at that! You are so kind to point it oout, you are so awesome. You are so cool! Mega bow to your awesomeness. You made that Roo-Mech one time, it was so cool. (18 years ago, 14-Feb-07, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 
  Re: Figure it out
 
(...) You still as a fellow Lego Fan, took another LUGNET member's pictures repeatedly from Brickshelf to use in a mean spirited manner is completely uncool for what ever your reasons. Until You, Kevoh, Jude and Soren used my pictures to wage your (...) (18 years ago, 14-Feb-07, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 
  Re: illogical behavior ;)
 
--snip-- I think this entire argument can be put down to a disagreement over what evidence is applicable to the use in the argument. I think you're as unlikely to convince me that your choices are valid as I am to convince you that mine are. We are (...) (18 years ago, 14-Feb-07, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
 
  Re: malicious behavior
 
(...) I think you should start writing in English first. (18 years ago, 14-Feb-07, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 
  Re: malicious behavior
 
(...) Once again obfuscation--my replies to your comments-- 'I’ve stayed out of this thread until this comment. There is no evidence that Eric is in anyway better than this. There is plenty of evidence that he is not. Just because people get a rise (...) (18 years ago, 14-Feb-07, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 
  Re: Tim's beef behavior
 
(...) I stand before your awesomeness. I yeild oh great brick master Tim. For your awesomeness is so great how can I build ye. The bricks are to small, I am afraid I can not compete. \\\...\\\ (18 years ago, 14-Feb-07, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 
  Re: malicious behavior
 
(...) --snip-- (...) If you think that Eric deserves an apology then perhaps you should apologise to him. Since you had as much to do with the original issue as I did then you owe him an apology as much as I do. Furthermore I've never argued that (...) (18 years ago, 14-Feb-07, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)  
 
  Re: malicious behavior
 
(...) (*this is such a joke, I am just having fun in the way I transcribe the events*) Righgght! Brilliant, and upon further research one can plainly see, that another party, usual suspect, utters a complaint unto Eric Sophie's person, there by (...) (18 years ago, 14-Feb-07, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 
  Re: Tim's beef behavior
 
(...) Why bother? I was legally allowed to use them and given your typical behaviour I find it very unlikely you would volunteer to let me use them to poke fun at you. You can twist and turn all you like but what you did was morally wrong in my (...) (18 years ago, 14-Feb-07, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)  
 
  Re: malicious behavior
 
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Timothy Gould wrote: <snip> (...) I couldn't give a rats ass about DMCA, 'fair usage', 'freedom of speech' or '1st ammendment rights' or whatever people are going on about now--it's all obfuscating the actual issue. (...) (18 years ago, 14-Feb-07, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 
  Re: Tim's beef behavior
 
(...) -Snip- (...) -snip- (...) I bow to your awesomeness. Ever think to ask for the images? That was "Outside" LUGNET, now What'd I do "On" LUGNET? Again, bowing to your awesomeness. (18 years ago, 14-Feb-07, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 
  Re: malicious behavior
 
(...) And the American Government... (URL) (18 years ago, 14-Feb-07, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)  
 
  Re: malicious behavior
 
(...) Eric, The last thing you did wrong was to submit a DMCA image against me for an image the wasn't breaching your copyright. The image was legal. As I have explained to you by email it is called Fair Use for parody. That happened a few days ago (...) (18 years ago, 14-Feb-07, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)  
 
  Re: malicious behavior
 
Tim, what was the last thing I did wrong? Refresh our memories and back up your story. Then tell me what any of this has to do with you or the Technic Side bar and Ross's actions. Since you like to molest my images, having broke the law several (...) (18 years ago, 14-Feb-07, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 
  Re: Hurry up, Global Warming (to my neighborhood!)
 
(...) Yeah, we missed those temps by a week:-( Hey, what's up? I was in Tucson all last week-- didn't you this (URL) this>? AZAFOLs unite! JOHN FUT.us/az (18 years ago, 8-Feb-07, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
 
  Re: Hurry up, Global Warming (to my neighborhood!)
 
(...) Vunny stuff - but it was 81 here in Tucson the other day and mid 70s today - so your chart needs some additions I'm afraid :-) (18 years ago, 8-Feb-07, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
 
  Hurry up, Global Warming (to my neighborhood!)
 
I was on vacation last week to Arizona, and the temps were in the 50's. No problem though, since the high temps back home in Minnesota were below zero! It's since warmed up to the single digits, but this is getting old fast! My brother-in-law sent (...) (18 years ago, 8-Feb-07, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
 
  Re: Where's Larry and Hoppy when you need 'em???
 
For full disclosure, I should note that clicking on (URL) results in reload and a final URL of (URL) it's still asking for payment to read the article. (...) (18 years ago, 7-Feb-07, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 
  Re: Where's Larry and Hoppy when you need 'em???
 
Dave, I access your original link, and I get: ---...--- Arar to stay on watch list, U.S. says PAUL KORING AND JEFF SALLOT From Tuesday's Globe and Mail WASHINGTON, OTTAWA — Maher Arar should remain on the security watch list barring him from the (...) (18 years ago, 7-Feb-07, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 
  Re: Where's Larry and Hoppy when you need 'em???
 
I know you were writing to John, but... (...) Well, probably for a while longer. My thing is that we've taken on a responsibility by mucking things up in Iraq. What we've done so far has be pretty bad. What we'd be doing by bailing out would be even (...) (18 years ago, 6-Feb-07, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 
  Re: Where's Larry and Hoppy when you need 'em???
 
(...) Tom, I'd never knowingly link to a site that requires paying--I've never done so before and I still haven't--I don't have to pay for that site, so I can't figure out why you have to. (...) I found the free info and posted it. You know me--I'm (...) (18 years ago, 6-Feb-07, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 
  Re: Where's Larry and Hoppy when you need 'em???
 
(...) So you see no problem with spending a TRillion dollars per country for the war on terror? How long do you think the US can do this before a total collapse? Regardless of our rosy economy, if we insist on spending a TRillion dollars on Iraq (...) (18 years ago, 4-Feb-07, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 
  Re: Where's Larry and Hoppy when you need 'em???
 
(...) Do you? You stated in the post before this that you have no idea what info the gubmint has on these people, now you seem to know the facts. Which is it? You know, incarceration != guilt. The gubmint either needs to take the time to prove (...) (18 years ago, 4-Feb-07, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 
  Re: Where's Larry and Hoppy when you need 'em???
 
Dave, Please don't waste my time (and other) posting links to a site where you have to PAY to read the news. I'm sure you could have found the same basic info in a free link to post here. And just in case you try to say "it doesn't cost much in (...) (18 years ago, 4-Feb-07, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 
  Good luck with that...
 
(URL) Lebanese-born German, who accuses the CIA of having kidnapped and tortured him, says he is determined to get an apology from the US authorities." A Canadian sent to Syria by the US gov't to be tortured, was eventually released because of (...) (18 years ago, 3-Feb-07, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 
  Re: Are we done with teh 'Bush is good to the country' meme yet?
 
(...) "Every nation has the government it deserves." Joseph de Maistre w. (true survivor of the "Berlusconi" government) (18 years ago, 30-Jan-07, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 
  Are we done with teh 'Bush is good to the country' meme yet?
 
(URL) Jan. 29 — President Bush has signed a directive that gives the White House much greater control over the rules and policy statements that the government develops to protect public health, safety, the environment, civil rights and privacy" THe (...) (18 years ago, 30-Jan-07, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 
  Re: Proof that Canadians are insane
 
(...) Our nation's capital has enuf fruits and nuts and vegetables, thank you very much. Though, didn't Dubya come from texas? He's the biggest nutcake of 'em all... nuts and bananas.... a banana split! I'm hungry now Dave K (18 years ago, 30-Jan-07, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 
  Re: Proof that Canadians are insane
 
(...) Mmmmmmmmm.... Bananaaaaaaa Gaagghahghaghghghghhhhhhhh.... (Homer Simpson drool...) Dave K (18 years ago, 30-Jan-07, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 
  Re: Proof that Canadians are insane
 
(...) Ohhhhhh I see. You are a banana SNOB. OK. As long as we both understand. As I see it, this momentous project is not so much about the technical feat involved, or the GREATNESS of the loft; but that you just HATE the idea that a LARGE, YELLOW (...) (18 years ago, 30-Jan-07, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 
  Re: Proof that Canadians are insane
 
(...) Look, all's I'm saying is that if a group of Canadians want to put a giant banana in the sky, there's plenty of room over Ottawa. DaveE (18 years ago, 30-Jan-07, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 
  Re: Proof that Canadians are insane
 
(...) um, AND? this makes perfect sense. whats NOT to get? or is it cause it's over TEXAS? Chris (18 years ago, 30-Jan-07, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 
  Proof that Canadians are insane
 
(URL) (18 years ago, 29-Jan-07, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 
  Bringing it back to what started it all...
 
Turns out that Mr. Arar was a *Canadian* citizen who was born in Syria. (URL) Arar is a computer engineer and Canadian citizen who was abducted by the U.S. Government in 2002 and sent to Syria for a year to be tortured despite having no terrorist (...) (18 years ago, 29-Jan-07, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
 
  Re: Where's Larry and Hoppy when you need 'em???
 
(...) Hey, Chris-- long time! (...) clunk (jaw on desk) (...) I would. It's honest and correct. We shouldn't have to apologize for protecting our national interests IMO. Nobody else would. (...) spppp (monitor sprayed by pop) LOL (...) Is that the (...) (18 years ago, 26-Jan-07, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
 
  Re: Where's Larry and Hoppy when you need 'em???
 
(...) Well, that is only thanks to the Israelis when they wiped out Osiraq. (...) Please. Radicals would have nuked us long before Bush had they the means and opportunity. (...) Which is exactly why we shouldn't allow them to acquire them! (...) (...) (18 years ago, 26-Jan-07, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
 
  Re: Where's Larry and Hoppy when you need 'em???
 
Hey all :) (...) That doesn't do much to address the point, Dave! You're right, but John probably is too. (...) To secure a stronghold on the oil-fields of the Middle-East in preparation for protecting the US supply chain and projecting force into (...) (18 years ago, 26-Jan-07, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)


Next Page:  5 more | 10 more | 20 more | 40 more

Redisplay Messages:  All | Compact

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR