To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.off-topic.clone-brandsOpen lugnet.off-topic.clone-brands in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Off-Topic / Clone Brands / 810
809  |  811
Subject: 
Re: Mega-Bloks (Ritvik) is watching
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.off-topic.clone-brands
Date: 
Mon, 5 Mar 2001 04:09:45 GMT
Viewed: 
676 times
  
In lugnet.off-topic.clone-brands, Richard Marchetti writes:
[...]
BTW, I can't believe how even-handed you are being about this, Todd.
Previous to this moment you seemed almost rabidly against any mention of
clones, with the exception of the existence of off-topic newsgroup for clone
brands.

I don't mind clone bashing (for lack of a better phrase) in the regular
groups, or comparisons between clones and LEGO, if it helps AFOLs.

What makes me ill is seeing reviews of clone brands seep into lugnet.reviews
(I think that happened only once, and I screamed quickly), or glorification
of clone brands in the main groups, or models glorifiying clone brands.
That's not what the site is about.  It's about LEGO® -- The One True Brand
of automatic binding bricks.  But you knew that.  We all know that.  :-)
I'm sure the LCAD folks don't want to see clone brand poisining in the CAD
stuff either.

At any rate, my point in the message earlier was to ask people to please
treat AFOLs who may also be MB employees with respect, even if they don't
respect MB the product or Ritvik the company.  That is, just because someone
works for MB doesn't mean they can't still be an AFOL.

Now, on the other hand, if some non-AFOL MB marketroid type should happen to
come around posting and spewing marketing sewage, I don't care if anyone
turns on the flamethrower.  ;-)

--Todd



Message has 3 Replies:
  Re: Mega-Bloks (Ritvik) is watching
 
(...) Speaking of which, the unofficial count of officially unofficial clone.dat's is now about 310, and I'm just polishing off a few linetype 5's before unleashing these non-canon (ie: I don't want them to be misconstrued as official LCad (...) (24 years ago, 5-Mar-01, to lugnet.off-topic.clone-brands)
  Re: Mega-Bloks (Ritvik) is watching
 
(...) The One True Brand is correct. (...) And it won't pollute anything official to LDraw.org. -Tim (24 years ago, 5-Mar-01, to lugnet.off-topic.clone-brands)
  Re: Mega-Bloks (Ritvik) is watching
 
Bricks is bricks, Todd. :) The LDLite "0 COLORNAME" command exists mainly to support the colors in the Megabloks Dinosaur sets. Of course, I never told anyone that...some of them thar LCAD folks can git mighty rabid... -gyug (...) (24 years ago, 5-Mar-01, to lugnet.off-topic.clone-brands)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Mega-Bloks (Ritvik) is watching
 
(...) I knew this. (...) Of course. MB is not the enemy here. One of their employees is certainly not the enemy here either! Bad design and the lack of resources (i.e. the bricks we need for a project) at a good price are the enemies we AFOL must (...) (24 years ago, 5-Mar-01, to lugnet.off-topic.clone-brands)

29 Messages in This Thread:












Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR