|
In lugnet.off-topic.clone-brands, Larry Pieniazek writes:
> In lugnet.off-topic.clone-brands, Tim Courtney writes:
>
> > > It's fun to joke around about clones being the enemy, yaddie yadda, but it's
> > > all in clean fun. If anything, I hope clones do well-- not because I'd ever
> > > buy them, but because they will keep TLC honest and motivated to live up to
> > > Ole's motto;-)
> >
> > Same here, I want LEGO to do better, so go clones. But, I will never buy
> > them, and as I just said, I'll educate consumers wherever I can on the
> > quality differences, purity, shameless ripoff nature, etc...
>
> Here's a question... Why should Ritvik make what we want just to be a foil
> for LEGO? Wouldn't it be in Ritvik's interest to make stuff that we actually
> would buy? If we're not going to buy it, why should they bother?
>
> Something to think about.
I'm not saying they will/should do that with that intent, I know they won't.
But, I'm saying, I want what they make to have that result.
-Tim
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Mega-Bloks (Ritvik) is watching
|
| (...) Here's a question... Why should Ritvik make what we want just to be a foil for LEGO? Wouldn't it be in Ritvik's interest to make stuff that we actually would buy? If we're not going to buy it, why should they bother? Something to think about. (...) (24 years ago, 4-Mar-01, to lugnet.off-topic.clone-brands)
|
29 Messages in This Thread:
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|