Subject:
|
Re: Discussion about UKLUG web site (was: Re: Leaving for a while or a long time)
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.loc.uk
|
Date:
|
Thu, 28 Jun 2001 23:25:23 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
534 times
|
| |
|
|
Hi,
How about a GBI (GB & Ire) group (Lions!?) i.e. British Isles group?
There are too few here to be a nuisance and are otherwise stranded ...
Ronan
Phil Traviss <philt@castleton-comms.co.uk> wrote in message
news:GFJDsx.Mn0@lugnet.com...
> The flavour of the general feeling about what does/doesn't need to be done
> may be seen here: http://news.lugnet.com/org/?n=384, and its 3 replies.
>
> My thoughts FWIW:
>
> 1. I believe we should 'tidy up after ourselves', so there is some • immediate
> work to be done in www.uklug.org.uk, even if that's to mark the whole site
> as under construction, and a redirect to LUGNET local uk.
>
> 2. It would probably be useful to have a known central point of reference
> for fest information. It could still link to a personal web site (eg JJ
> Railton's)
>
> 3. I think James's offer is a good one, but he needs to be given our • support
> in terms of the direction the effort needs to be made, if any.
>
> 4. I don't think moving it to a yahoo list is the way to go.
>
> Treat this as another Request For Comments if you will.
>
> Phil.
>
>
> In lugnet.loc.uk, James Stacey writes:
> > If we do need a new site I'm willin to help. I'm a web developer so I • could
> > write us a nice DB driven site if we need, and I have lots of friends who
> > are web graphic designers who'd help out with the design angle.
> > let me know if you wanna go forward on it
> >
> > James
> > www.minifig.co.uk
> >
> >
> > "Phil Traviss" <philt@castleton-comms.co.uk> wrote in message
> > news:005801c0fe2d$d1c5d2c0$5901020a@castletoncomms.co.uk...
> > > It's sad to hear of someone as keen as Michael not being able to carry • on
> > > contributing to the LUGNET community, but hopefully he will still be • active,
> > > and his situation will improve in due course.
> > >
> > > One thing he was interested to tackle was updating the UK LUG site
> > > (http://www.uklug.org.uk/) which is hopelessly out of date.
> > >
> > > Michael offered (http://news.lugnet.com/loc/uk/?n=5956), and was handed • over
> > > by Richard Franks (http://news.lugnet.com/loc/uk/?n=6041), but didn't • appear
> > > to have much subsequent success progressing his plans.
> > >
> > > I am guessing that 'to release the pressure' that is one of the • casualties.
> > >
> > > So, any takers?
> > >
> > > Phil.
> > >
> > > PS: Don't look at me, I have neither the time nor the appropriate
> > expertise.
> <remainder snipped>
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
27 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
