Subject:
|
Re: So where is Brad's answer to the 2001 info?
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.lego.direct
|
Date:
|
Mon, 21 Aug 2000 15:38:18 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
760 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.lego.direct, Eric Joslin writes:
> Och. Well, make better sets, and you won't have to worry about
> cannibalisation. Seriously.
I hate to follow myself up, but I thought of something else in this vein:
I've spent well over $250 in the past two weeks on Lego. Probably closer to
$300. Lego will see none of that money, because it wasn't spent in a store.
It was spent on eBay and in private deals, buying sets that are, in my opinion,
higher-quality than what Lego produces today.
You should be less concerned with future releases cannibalizing your sales than
with old releases doing the same.
eric
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: So where is Brad's answer to the 2001 info?
|
| (...) I spend more on new store-bought sets than those old sets on Ebay, but I should explain in detail. I buy the new sets when they are on sale or deep discount. (judging from the shelves, S@H will be offering Town Jr. and Rock Raider sets for (...) (24 years ago, 22-Aug-00, to lugnet.lego.direct)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: So where is Brad's answer to the 2001 info?
|
| (...) Really. Well, those parts certainly moved fast enough to tell you to contact Todd and ask him to remove it. Those parts also certainly moved fast enough to tell you that there was absolutely legal reasoning behind the "request" when Todd asked (...) (24 years ago, 21-Aug-00, to lugnet.lego.direct)
|
22 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
