Subject:
|
Re: So where is Brad's answer to the 2001 info?
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.lego.direct
|
Date:
|
Sun, 20 Aug 2000 22:57:02 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
2969 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.lego.direct, Todd Lehman writes:
> [...]
> Here are my suggestions...
>
> If, in the future, someone posts objectionable sensitive information:
>
> 1. Write the person(s) via private e-mail and politely ask them to
> voluntarily cancel their post(s), and offering, of course, an explanation.
>
> 2. If that doesn't produce results within a reasonable amount of time, write
> them back with a formal legal request to voluntaily cancel it.
>
> 3. If that doesn't produce results within a reasonable amount of time, post
> a public statement noting the objection and requiring that objectionable
> information be forcibly expunged from the system. Also send a copy of this
> via email to system the admin (me). Note: Any private e-mail received which
> differs from a public message will be posted publicly as part of the paper
> trail. If the e-mail contains a request not to post the message publicly,
> either please don't send it, or expect it to be disregarded.
>
> 4. If that still doesn't produce results within a reasonable amount of time,
> make a phone call.
>
> 5. If that still doesn't produce results, threaten legal action.
>
> Does this sound fair?
(Replying to my own post)
Just to be clear, the above are _suggestions_ to LEGO as to how to handle
events like this in the future. They do not represent or define LUGNET site
policy. Thus, "within a reasonable amount of time" is up to LEGO to decide.
It might, in cases (like this one, for example), make sense for them to do
#3 first, and then a whole bunch of #1's. #5 is kinda obvious, if something
gets that far, which it most probably never would, but I threw it in for
completeness.
--Todd
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: So where is Brad's answer to the 2001 info?
|
| In lugnet.lego.direct, Todd Lehman writes: <snip> (...) which (...) <snip> (...) Sorry I missed the part about being suggestions to TLC. I do still see some problem with #3. I'm not sure what all the ramifications of publishing a private (...) (26 years ago, 20-Aug-00, to lugnet.lego.direct)
|
Message is in Reply To:
22 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
