To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.instOpen lugnet.inst in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Instructions / 246
245  |  247
Subject: 
Re: LSynth 2.0 Available
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.cad, lugnet.cad.dev, lugnet.inst
Date: 
Fri, 17 Jan 2003 13:03:56 GMT
Viewed: 
940 times
  
Bill,
  My initial thought is.... what are the chances that someone will find a
commercial use for this program?  But in thinking about it more, I have no
idea how far other contributing authors will take this program, so out of
respect for their future efforts, I guess GPL is the best choice.

Kevin

In lugnet.cad, William R. Ward writes:
"Don Heyse" <dheyse@hotmail.spam.go.away.com> writes:
In lugnet.cad, Kevin Clague writes:
Hi Don,
I have no idea what license to choose.  Do you have a recommendation?

Not really.  I tend to waver somewhere between the GPL and Public Domain,
depending on how long it's been since I've had trouble with piece of
closed software.  Of the few licences here http://opensource.org/licenses/
that I've read, the zlib license is the shortest, and I do like to keep
things short and simple if possible.

GPL is the best in terms or preserving the author's rights.  Public
Domain is a bad idea - it means you surrender any rights to the
software, and people can then basically use it to build their own
commercial programs and wouldn't owe you anything!  With GPL, they
can't make commercial software out of it without negociating a
separate license.

--Bill.



Message has 1 Reply:
  Re: LSynth 2.0 Available
 
(...) Another issue is the ownership of the changes. Do you wish to require authors who contribute changes to assign ownership of the changes to you? If you do not, then the program becomes partly owned by you and all whose code you have accepted (...) (22 years ago, 19-Jan-03, to lugnet.cad, lugnet.cad.dev, lugnet.inst)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: LSynth 2.0 Available
 
(...) GPL is the best in terms or preserving the author's rights. Public Domain is a bad idea - it means you surrender any rights to the software, and people can then basically use it to build their own commercial programs and wouldn't owe you (...) (22 years ago, 16-Jan-03, to lugnet.cad, lugnet.cad.dev, lugnet.inst)

53 Messages in This Thread:
















Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR