General Discussion : 6806


General / 6806	6805 \| 6807

Subject:	Re: Spare Lego for us (Re: The Ruthlessness of Lego was (Re: Spare Parts Service - How it works))
Newsgroups:	lugnet.general
Date:	Thu, 19 Aug 1999 13:57:52 GMT
Viewed:	2230 times

On Thu, 19 Aug 1999 03:37:01 GMT, "Naji Norder" <n.norder@computer.org> wrote: > As far as sorting goes, I'm not sure if sorting by parts would be realistic - It's likely the parts are already (mostly) sorted, with each part having its own bin. Or case, depending on the quantity. Now, sorting out for shipping to different buyers would still be required. And would be a big pain, if people were allowed to buy specific quantities. "I'd like 25 red 2x4 bricks, and 51 blue 2x3's, ..." At the scale under we're likely talking about, that level of detail isn't reasonable. Except for rare and/or valuable parts. So I'd suggest selling by the pound or quart (or kilogram or liter). Steve

Message has 1 Reply:

		Re: Spare Lego for us (Re: The Ruthlessness of Lego was (Re: Spare Parts Service - How it works))
Steve Bliss <blisses@worldnet.att.net> wrote in message news:37bc0c40.150569...net.com... (...) realistic - (...) This is how much of it is sorted although in much smaller quantities than many people imagine. Remember LEGO NZ is a much, much (...) (25 years ago, 19-Aug-99, to lugnet.general)

Message is in Reply To:

		Re: Spare Lego for us (Re: The Ruthlessness of Lego was (Re: Spare Parts Service - How it works))
(...) Wow. That's much lower than we were expecting... Marcia and I could probably swing several hundred dollars for it. (Rent - what rent?) (...) If there aren't enough people in New Zealand to split it up by weight, it should all be shipped en (...) (25 years ago, 19-Aug-99, to lugnet.general)

39 Messages in This Thread:

Entire Thread on One Page:: Nested: All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear: All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:: Nested: All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear: All | Brief | Compact

Custom Search