Subject:
|
Re: Is Brickshelf slow for anyone else lately?
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.general
|
Date:
|
Mon, 2 Dec 2002 19:07:21 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1257 times
|
| |
|
|
Snipped a lot of good suggestions about being a bit more economical.
In lugnet.general, Amy Hughes writes:
> I paid $30 to advertise my personal site when brickshelf had banner ads,
> got a
> lot fewer than 100,000 impressions, and most of it went to someone who is now
> spamming me with potty-language "newsletters".
Weird, I bought space there too and am not getting spammed. Why is that?
Wonder if it was one of those "look hard and make sure you uncheck it or
else you said you wanted it" kind of forms??? I always scan those very very
carefully
> I'd be happy to pay that
> much to
> support BS again if it went instead to Kevin, and day-sponsor ads would be
> easier to implement than metered, randomly-selected ads.
Agree, and agree again.
>
> One barrier to non-commercial banner ads is the creation of the banner. >Perhaps a few folks might be willing to make banners for people,
> or maybe an online
> banner generator would encourage more support.
A banner generator that just created text in a color with a choice of
background color would not be that hard to do, ne? I bet someone could whip
up a quick Javascript app to do that much in short order.
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Is Brickshelf slow for anyone else lately?
|
| (...) A few ideas to ignore... 1) If folks would use their brickshelf accounts as if they were paying for them there'd be a lot less bandwidth used. Limits to image and folder sizes have been suggested before. Other bandwidth-limiting features might (...) (22 years ago, 2-Dec-02, to lugnet.general)
|
42 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
