Subject:
|
Re: 2532 Passenger Jet: Your worst fears realized...
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.general
|
Date:
|
Fri, 23 Apr 1999 15:25:09 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
740 times
|
| |
|
|
Well, I have two #6375, and the color scheme was great. It also has two
mini vehicles, the forklift and the little car. The cargo logos were
"printed" on the parts, and the back of the plane folded out to put
cargo in the back. The side of the plane, in back of the pilot, folded
up to load cargo from there as well. The inside was lined with smooth
1x8x1's for easy package loading.
This set 2532 is a good passenger plane/cargo plane with a lot of work,
but it doesn't come close to #6375.
Scott Sanburn
Gene Rodriguez III wrote:
>
> Scott,
>
> Actually, if you compare 2532 to 6375, they're not much different.
>
> The cargo version has more wheels and engines, but the fuselage is
> almost identical (including the hinged roof opening).
>
> [shrug]
> Gene
>
> Scott Edward Sanburn wrote:
> > It's OK for parts, but it is nothing like, oh, #6375, the Trans-Air
> > Carrier. Now that was a cargo plane! :)
> >
> > Scott Sanburn
> >
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: 2532 Passenger Jet: Your worst fears realized...
|
| Scott, I guess what I was most referring to was the size and the hinged roof being almost identical. Since I don't have 6375 and haven't opened 2532, I can't really comment on anything other than a comparison of the cover art. Gene (...) (25 years ago, 23-Apr-99, to lugnet.general)
|
Message is in Reply To:
38 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
