Subject:
|
Re: what are the 5 worst lego elements?
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.general
|
Date:
|
Tue, 19 Jun 2001 12:02:13 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
834 times
|
| |
 | |
----- Original Message -----
From: "Jonathan Wilson" <jonwil@tpgi.com.au>
Subject: Re: what are the 5 worst lego elements?
<snip>
> > > and 5.technic angle connectors
> >
> > They are also useful when you just need so sort of cage.
>
> Yes but it would be better for lego to be using the old style connectors that
> could be connected at any angle...
Well, remember that the old connectors need an axle with bushings
running through them to hold them together, and sometimes that just
isn't what is desired. It would still be better if BOTH types were
still available, of course
-Andy Lynch
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: what are the 5 worst lego elements?
|
| (...) True but it would be better to use 2 half beans for this job... (...) Yes but it would be better for lego to be using the old style connectors that could be connected at any angle... (...) Yep, they are pretty useless. I have far more than I (...) (24 years ago, 19-Jun-01, to lugnet.general)
|
32 Messages in This Thread:     
        
           
         
        
      
         
      
     
  
        
  ![Contest: Unusual use of "bad" Lego elements [was: Re: what are the 5 worst lego elements?] -William R. Ward (19-Jun-01 to lugnet.general, lugnet.build.contests)](/news/x.gif)  ![Re: Contest: Unusual use of "bad" Lego elements [was: Re: what are the 5 worst lego elements?] -Jonathan Wilson (20-Jun-01 to lugnet.general)](/news/x.gif)  ![Re: Contest: Unusual use of "bad" Lego elements [was: Re: what are the 5 worst lego elements?] -William R. Ward (20-Jun-01 to lugnet.general)](/news/x.gif)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|