Subject:
|
Re: !!!IMPORTANT!!!-SPUDS No fault of TLG-!!!IMPORTANT!!!
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.general, lugnet.dear-lego
|
Date:
|
Tue, 27 Feb 2001 04:56:20 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1570 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.general, Ross Crawford writes:
>
> Larry Pieniazek <lpieniazek@mercator.com> wrote in message
> news:G9DnBx.E2y@lugnet.com...
> >
> > I can come up with a justification for the existance of any part you care • to
> > name, and an example of a model that would be weaker if it had to use the
> > composite parts instead.
>
> I bring to your attention the 1-piece axle/propeller in 8855. I can see
> *absolutely no justification* for that part.
You're talking about the part in this view:
http://www.brickshelf.com/scans/8000/8855/8855-13.html
from a 1988 (!!!) Technic (!!!) set, right? If that's the best part you can
come up with, perhaps it's the exception that proves the rule.
I don't have a copy of this set, send me yours, let me examine it closely,
and I'll get back to you with the justification I promised. :-)
++Lar
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
Message is in Reply To:
37 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
