Subject:
|
Re: !!!IMPORTANT!!!-SPUDS No fault of TLG-!!!IMPORTANT!!!
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.general
|
Date:
|
Tue, 27 Feb 2001 02:32:30 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
686 times
|
| |
|
|
[removed .dear-lego from crosspost list on this reply]
In lugnet.dear-lego, Frank Filz writes:
> I must say that I get tired listening to folks whining about POOPs when
> it is regularly pointed out that there are in fact good reasons to use
> them. One must also remember that there really aren't that many true
> POOPs (note that a BURP is NOT a POOP - you can't possibly make a BURP
> out of bricks - you can make something that in many cases looks the
> same, but you can't make exactly the same thing, I'm also sure that a
> BURP costs less than the 10+ bricks that it would take to replace it).
The original example for a "POOP" (_P_ieces _O_utta _O_ther _P_ieces) back
on RTL was a 1x1x5 tall brick, but IMHO, a BURP would also be an excellent
example of a POOP.
Naturally, it's true that you can't make a _hollow_ BURP out of regular
rectangular bricks stuck together, but if anyone's claiming that a solid
BURP can't be made out of 2xN's and 1xN's, I wanna see a mathematical proof
of that before I believe it. :-)
--Todd
|
|
Message has 2 Replies:
Message is in Reply To:
37 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
