Subject:
|
Re: !!!IMPORTANT!!!-SPUDS No fault of TLG-!!!IMPORTANT!!!
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.general, lugnet.dear-lego
|
Date:
|
Mon, 26 Feb 2001 18:28:45 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1396 times
|
| |
|
|
Stop fighting! You're both right.
In lugnet.dear-lego, Tim Courtney writes:
> "Frank Filz" <ffilz@mindspring.com> wrote in message
> news:3A99D1EF.5BDE2965@mindspring.com...
> > Tim Courtney wrote:
> > > I don't know figures...but POOPs are really a waste of money, especially • when
> > > molds of their component parts already exist and have been in use for years.
> >
> > I'll continue to disagree, and I'll happily take those classic space
> > printed 1x6x5 bricks off the hands of anyone who feels POOPs should
> > never exist.
>
> Fine, if you're going to be picky about my statement, I'll revise it. Certain
> poops are a waste of money, and have no business existing. Eg...2x4x3 brick,
> speed bump with 2x4x2 protrusions on it (from City Center bridge set) etc.
That statement is too strongly worded.
I can come up with a justification for the existance of any part you care to
name, and an example of a model that would be weaker if it had to use the
composite parts instead.
That said, when doing a cost benefit analysis I tend to think that I would
have rather seen the molding money spent elsewhere for many of the parts
even if I CAN justify them.
> I'm sorry I committed the grave offense of confusing SPUDs and POOPs, I wonder
> if I'll ever be forgiven.
Keep wondering! I know I can't keep them straight. We may be overacronyming
for the sake of humor/cuteness/insularity.
++Lar
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
Message is in Reply To:
37 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
