| |
In lugnet.loc.au, Richard Parsons writes:
> Even if Todd was being unreasonable (which he's not), that's fine, its his site!
I have a real problem with Lugnet being considered Todd and Suzanne's
exclusive sandbox -- in reality, it is and it isn't depending on what part
we are examining. People contribute time, money, content, scans, etc. It
strikes me as a community effort in MANY ways. It's a little too heavy in
attitude to just assert that we cannot support clones brands in some way in
the database and to provide no reasons for this posture.
Maybe I would feel differently if I knew the costs, or other efforts
involved. From where I am sitting, Todd has all the structure, programming,
bandwidth, etc. It looks like the costs come down to space on a server hard
drive somewhere and the scanned contributions that would comprise the content.
I don't want to hammer Todd, but perhaps something more than a terse
one-liner is required here by way of response.
So watch it, Baldy!
=)
-- Richard (also baldly going)
|
|
Message has 4 Replies:
Message is in Reply To:
61 Messages in This Thread:
  
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
