Subject:
|
Re: Once again, a relativley major bug...
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.cad.mlcad
|
Date:
|
Sun, 14 Sep 2003 16:54:44 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
3890 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.cad.mlcad, Andrew Keyser wrote:
> I guess I was mistaken in my first post, it's a feature request, sorry.
> But I still think it's major, maybe because I am used to the
> functionality of an "Absolute" rotation system.
Hi Andrew,
Your feature request is no less important than a bug report. I think it is
good to put out new feature requests because they typically are meaningful to
more than one person. This is how the program gets better.
I'm just a stickler about bug reports vs. new features, because there are a
few out there who just can't seem to learn the difference.
Kevin
>
> -AK
>
> Kevin L. Clague wrote:
> > In lugnet.cad.mlcad, Andrew Keyser wrote:
> >
> > > I am in no way saying MLCad is bad, just the 3d view rotation.
> > >
> > > By the way, you were wrong about both of those programs being paid for,
> > > ZModeler is free.
> > >
> > > I do know how much work goes into 3D, but I'm not referencing to
> > > anything that involves changing 3D polygons or attributes at all.
> > > You try ZModeler and tell me how much more sense the 3D rotation
> > > controls make. By 3D controls I mean clicking and dragging the 3D view,
> > > Zmodeler uses a rotation technique known as "Absolute" rotation, whereas
> > > MLCad uses "Relative"--I don't see how hard it could be to just change
> > > the rotation algorithm type.
> >
> >
> > But.... was it a bug or a feature request?
> >
> >
> > > -AK
> >
> >
> >
> > Kevin
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
28 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
