| |
Dear All (but mostly PT Reviewers),
I'd like to update all the current primitive files to be BFC compliant.
This wouldn't be a huge task, at least for the geometric primitives (boxes,
circles, discs, rings, cones, cylinders, and torii).
But when I start submitting these files to the Parts Tracker, most part
files will change status to "one or more subfiles not certified". This
could wreak havoc with us reviewing and certifying files - if no one reviews
the primitives, the parts can never reach a "certified!" status.
So my question is this: if I submit BFC'ed primitives, is anyone ready and
willing to review the files for correctness? If no is able to review these
files, I won't submit them at this time.
Steve
|
|
Message has 3 Replies:
 | | Re: BFC and Primitives
|
| (...) IMHO, i don't consider BFC statements as an important ldraw issue, for following reasons: 1. Popular tools do not use these statements (including LDraw, MLCad, LDView and L3P & POV-ray). L3Lab use them but L3Lab is superceded by LDView both in (...) (23 years ago, 6-Mar-02, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
| | | Re: BFC and Primitives
|
| (...) I have a question. Given that the cylinder primitives (among others) are used in situations where they are either the inner surface or the outer, won't adding BFC information to them cause problems? --Travis Cobbs (tcobbs@REMOVE.halibut.com) (23 years ago, 8-Mar-02, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
| | | Re: BFC and Primitives
|
| Since there was never any response from reviewers who affirmed that they would help review these files if I submitted them, I'll hold off on this project for now. Which is too bad -- one of the key parts of BFC compliance is to wrap polygons (...) (23 years ago, 11-Mar-02, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
26 Messages in This Thread:
  
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
