LDraw (www.ldraw.org) : 1886


CAD / Development / Organizations / LDraw / 1886	1885 \| 1887

Subject:	Re: FAQ for Part Reviewers (was: Re: BFC and Primitives)
Newsgroups:	lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw
Date:	Wed, 20 Mar 2002 23:03:06 GMT
Viewed:	508 times

In lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw, Damien Guichard writes: > In lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw, Steve Bliss writes: > > > > "Do you have to be a part author to be a part reviewer?" > > > > What do you all think about this? Yes? No? Have No Idea? LMK. > > My hints to new and more part reviewers [snip] This is great info/advice! Can this be included in a "reviewer FAQ"? (Is there one already?) > 3. When satisfied, there is also no reason that you refrain a "certify" > vote. Other reviewers will double-check. Also LDraw parts are not really > definitive. Yes, yes! Please remember that, even after a part has been certified & included in the official parts library *it can still be improved*!! ROSCO

Message has 1 Reply:

		Re: FAQ for Part Reviewers (was: Re: BFC and Primitives)
(...) I think so, too. (...) If it's alright with Damien, I will add it. (...) I just put one together earlier today. (URL). Steve (23 years ago, 21-Mar-02, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)

Message is in Reply To:

		Re: FAQ for Part Reviewers (was: Re: BFC and Primitives)
(...) My hints to new and more part reviewers Because it is claimed that reviewers are highly qualified people, some potential volunteers may be intimidated. I was also at first. I am not a part author and even less a highly qualified people (in (...) (23 years ago, 20-Mar-02, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)

26 Messages in This Thread:

Entire Thread on One Page:: Nested: All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear: All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:: Nested: All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear: All | Brief | Compact

Custom Search