Subject:
|
Re: FAQ for Part Reviewers (was: Re: BFC and Primitives)
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw
|
Date:
|
Tue, 19 Mar 2002 23:37:12 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
411 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw, Steve Bliss writes:
>
> It was pointed out to me, offline, that one key question not addressed in
> the FAQ is this:
>
> "Do you have to be a part author to be a part reviewer?"
>
> What do you all think about this? Yes? No? Have No Idea? LMK.
I think "have to be" is a bit strong, however "highly recommended" would be
good if you can squeeze it in there somehow 8?) I know I learnt a lot about
reviewing (and authoring!) from the comments I got from other reviewers about
parts I've authored (written?).
ROSCO
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
26 Messages in This Thread:
  
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
