 | | Re: New LDraw Parts
|
|
Rene Virsik schrieb: (...) Please have a look at this thread: (URL) also hope that there will be more people that are working on the parts on the parts tracker. cu Michael Heidemann (mikeheide) (18 years ago, 28-Jan-07, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | New LDraw Parts
|
|
Hi, I want to ask you if there will be some new official LDraw Parts ? The last update is from December 2005. Thanks. (18 years ago, 28-Jan-07, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: New LDraw Contest: POTM – Part Of The Month
|
|
Ok, I just woke up 30 minutes ago after far too few hours of sleep (as usual), and realized that I should've just shut up and see how things unfolded... considering how many times the well meaning people of this community have managed to make things (...) (18 years ago, 28-Jan-07, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: New LDraw Contest: POTM – Part Of The Month
|
|
In lugnet.announce, Willy Tschager wrote: Neat idea! (...) Note that this doesn't stop someone submitting an update of a part that already exists (in the official library). I actually think that's good - major reworks of existing parts *should* be (...) (18 years ago, 27-Jan-07, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: New LDraw Contest: POTM – Part Of The Month
|
|
(...) Hi Niels, I could be misreading you but just in case it reads as though you are assuming that the reviewers submit the part for voting. That is not the case, the author must submit their own part which means that if you've submitted something (...) (18 years ago, 27-Jan-07, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: New LDraw Contest: POTM – Part Of The Month
|
|
(...) niels, what do you think content managers are for? voting will be of course a piece of cake! just like MOTM/SOTM. luckily I've already started to set up a ballot and luckily I've got already some entries - have a look: (URL) cannot vote yet (...) (18 years ago, 27-Jan-07, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: New LDraw Contest: POTM – Part Of The Month
|
|
This is a really great idea... But I find it a little difficult to see how you can participate unless you're one of the small handfull of reviewers with a constant level of high activity: If you aren't paying really close attention to the PT on a (...) (18 years ago, 27-Jan-07, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw, FTX)
|
| |
| | Official launch of the LDraw POTM - Part Of The Month contest
|
|
The LDraw Administration Team officially launches the POTM – Part Of The Month contest for LDraw Part Authors. It is no news that programmers get most of the spotlight and little goes to "the unsung heroes of the LDraw CAD world" - this contest (...) (18 years ago, 25-Jan-07, to lugnet.cad, lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw, lugnet.announce) !
|
| |
| | Re: Contributor Agreement License details
|
|
(...) guys, before speculation grow wild I'll take the whole thing back to the steerco. thx for any input - though I have to admit that some posts go further than my wildest dreams ever did. as far as I understand the license both license files have (...) (18 years ago, 18-Jan-07, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: Contributor Agreement License details
|
|
(...) I wonder whether a model file really qualifies as a "collective work" under this definition since an LDR file doesn't actually contain the parts definitions, only references to them. (Unless of course, the external parts definitions are (...) (18 years ago, 18-Jan-07, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: Contributor Agreement License details
|
|
(...) This is crazy talk. People sign paintings, but nobody is ever gonna staple a note on the back of a painting that says, "This painting was created with ACME brand paints and brushes." Please don't insert any such crazy demand in the ldraw (...) (18 years ago, 18-Jan-07, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: Contributor Agreement License details
|
|
(...) While rendered images are Derivative Works, I do not think you would have to add anything such as a copyright notice to them. The language of the CALicense.txt paragraph 4.2 says to the extent reasonably practicable or at a minimum where you (...) (18 years ago, 18-Jan-07, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: Contributor Agreement License details
|
|
(...) All of the parts authors would have to agree to that, because (and my knowledge is limited so if I mistake any assumptions let me know) the copyright of the part file seems to be held by the parts author not the LDraw Parts Library or any (...) (18 years ago, 18-Jan-07, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: Contributor Agreement License details
|
|
(...) There is one significant difference between LDraw and Photoshop in that you pay for the right to use Photoshop without giving credit. That said I don't think we need to vandalise our images to put the credit in but I'm not completely averse to (...) (18 years ago, 18-Jan-07, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: Contributor Agreement License details
|
|
(...) In publishing, that type of info is usually contained in a colophon, the use of which is sadly fading from popularity. Some few web sites include this level of detail in their "About" section. I agree it would be nice to see attribution in (...) (18 years ago, 18-Jan-07, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: Contributor Agreement License details
|
|
(...) As one of the CA's authors, my view on this is that you should state somewhere in your distribution of the image (i.e. on the web page hosting it, as a text file in a .zip, on the image itself, etc...) that the content were derived from the (...) (18 years ago, 18-Jan-07, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: Contributor Agreement License details
|
|
(...) I agree, clarification on rendered images is needed. If a rendering using LDraw parts is a derivative work, and derivative works are required to visibly display credit, that's a problem. It won't show up on my renders; I don't burn "Credit: (...) (18 years ago, 18-Jan-07, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: Contributor Agreement License details
|
|
(...) Maybe it's just me, but if renderings are considered derivative works, we need to seriously step back and think long and hard about whether or not we are OK with that. I personally think that forcing renderings to have text on them (...) (18 years ago, 18-Jan-07, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: Contributor Agreement License details
|
|
(...) Maybe It's a stupid question but here goes ... Does this mean when you put a rendering (or rendered animation) on the Internet you must scribble 100+ names on the png / frames / end credits. If so I think that's very restricting, a simple (...) (18 years ago, 18-Jan-07, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: Contributor Agreement License details
|
|
Hi Zach, (...) Actually it is misspelt throughout the Licence but I can't be bothered to go through it. Insofar as LDraw has an official language it is Australian English. (...) Good point. Perhaps an additional comment like: In order to avoid the (...) (18 years ago, 17-Jan-07, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: Contributor Agreement License details
|
|
First, let me disclaim that this is not legal advice. It is merely my understanding of the CA License. I do have some legal knowledge of copyrights, but for any legal advice please contact and retain an attorney. Second, I don't know whether this is (...) (18 years ago, 17-Jan-07, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: New LDraw Contest: POTM – Part Of The Month
|
|
(...) Well, that shows off a possible flaw in my suggestion. LDView doesn't automatically download unofficial versions of official parts. The part in your example has an official version, and that gets shown instead of the one on the tracker. (...) (18 years ago, 16-Jan-07, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: Contributor Agreement License details
|
|
(...) no replies so far :-( we will than call for the ratification, though we would really appreciate some comments from people with legal knowledge, better experience in copyright matters before going to vote. w. (18 years ago, 16-Jan-07, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: New LDraw Contest: POTM – Part Of The Month
|
|
(...) I set up a test contest which does exactly this. ultimately the file would be stored at ldraw.org. click on it and instead of saving on your disk open it with LDView. (URL) (18 years ago, 16-Jan-07, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: Call for Nominations: 2007 LDraw.org Steering Committee
|
|
(...) I, Zach Best, accept this nominiation. (18 years ago, 15-Jan-07, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: New LDraw Contest: POTM – Part Of The Month
|
|
--snip-- (...) Not by hand... that's what Perl is for ;) Tim (18 years ago, 15-Jan-07, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: New LDraw Contest: POTM – Part Of The Month
|
|
In lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw, Willy Tschager wrote: ... (...) ... I think having a direct link to the part would be a great idea. <shameless self-promotion> You could even include a .dat file that contains exactly one line: a reference to the part. (...) (18 years ago, 14-Jan-07, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: New LDraw Contest: POTM – Part Of The Month
|
|
(...) please consider that the part is available for download at the PT and you can have a closer look than an entire gallery of pics would allow. I could include the link to the part in the contest though (but I have to check back with orion (...) (18 years ago, 14-Jan-07, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: New LDraw Contest: POTM – Part Of The Month
|
|
(...) What about 4? Front, Top, Side and Iso Tim (18 years ago, 14-Jan-07, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: New LDraw Contest: POTM – Part Of The Month
|
|
(...) I think it's a great idea to put the part authors in the spot light. But isn't one view a bit limited? Especially for the more complex / non symmetrical parts. Just my 2 cents :) Roland (18 years ago, 14-Jan-07, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | New LDraw Contest: POTM – Part Of The Month
|
|
Hi folks, the LDraw.org Administration Team would like to introduce a new contest. It will be called: POTM – Part Of The Month It is no news that programs get most of the spotlight and little goes to "the unsung heroes of the LDraw CAD world" - this (...) (18 years ago, 14-Jan-07, to lugnet.announce, lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw, lugnet.cad) !
|
| |
| | Re: Call for Nominations: 2007 LDraw.org Steering Committee
|
|
(...) Thanks guys, I accept -Orion (18 years ago, 12-Jan-07, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: Call for Nominations: 2007 LDraw.org Steering Committee
|
|
(...) I, Tim Gould, second this nomination. (18 years ago, 11-Jan-07, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: Call for Nominations: 2007 LDraw.org Steering Committee
|
|
(...) I, Willy Tschager, second this nomination (18 years ago, 11-Jan-07, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: Call for Nominations: 2007 LDraw.org Steering Committee
|
|
(...) I, Willy Tschager, nominate Orion Pobursky. w. (18 years ago, 11-Jan-07, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: Call for Nominations: 2007 LDraw.org Steering Committee
|
|
(...) Thanks guys, I accept the nomination. Chris (18 years ago, 10-Jan-07, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: Call for Nominations: 2007 LDraw.org Steering Committee
|
|
I, Tim Gould, nominate Zach Best. (18 years ago, 10-Jan-07, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: Call for Nominations: 2007 LDraw.org Steering Committee
|
|
(...) I really appreciate being nominated, but I anticipate having no extra free time this year. I'm really trying to get some animations out with the free time I currently have, and I already missed Christmas the deadline for my last one. :( Thanks (...) (18 years ago, 8-Jan-07, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | RE: Call for Nominations: 2007 LDraw.org Steering Committee
|
|
Thanks for the vote of confidence guys, but as real-work as gone into over-drive and with my LSC commitments, I'll have to decline William -----Original Message----- From: news-gateway@lugnet.com [mailto:news-gateway...ugnet.com] On Behalf Of Tim (...) (18 years ago, 3-Jan-07, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: Call for Nominations: 2007 LDraw.org Steering Committee
|
|
(...) I thank you both for the nomination, but I feel my strengths lie elsewhere, so I will respectfully decline my nomination to the SteerCo. ROSCO (18 years ago, 4-Jan-07, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
