Subject:
|
Re: New LDraw Contest: POTM – Part Of The Month
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw
|
Date:
|
Sat, 27 Jan 2007 21:49:02 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
2490 times
|
| |
|
|
This is a really great idea...
But I find it a little difficult to see how you can participate unless you’re
one of the small handfull of reviewers with a constant level of high activity:
If you aren’t paying really close attention to the PT on a daily basis, how are
you supposed to spot eligble (new) files among all the resubmitting and
reviewing activity in the “recent activity log”?
Isn’t it possible to automate the process and make a true “recent uploaded
files”-log like the “recent activity log” - And if so, perhaps even feeding this
list into the voting module automatically so that all new parts participate in
the contest and no one gets overlooked:
Assuming that the number of truly new parts each month is rather limited, I
can’t really see why a “House of Lords” of super reviewers (and occasional
author) should need to keep track of the recent files, and have an initial
“vote” on which parts they’d want to redirect to the admins, and make the
admins spend time adding the parts to the list manually - before the general
LDraw audience even have a real chance to participate...
I really hate to sound like the average lugnet bitch here, but I can’t help
feeling that the current model creates unnessecary work and hurt the democratic
process...
Cheers NB
|
|
Message has 2 Replies:
 | | Re: New LDraw Contest: POTM – Part Of The Month
|
| (...) niels, what do you think content managers are for? voting will be of course a piece of cake! just like MOTM/SOTM. luckily I've already started to set up a ballot and luckily I've got already some entries - have a look: (URL) cannot vote yet (...) (18 years ago, 27-Jan-07, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
| | | Re: New LDraw Contest: POTM – Part Of The Month
|
| (...) Hi Niels, I could be misreading you but just in case it reads as though you are assuming that the reviewers submit the part for voting. That is not the case, the author must submit their own part which means that if you've submitted something (...) (18 years ago, 27-Jan-07, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw, FTX)
|
Message is in Reply To:
15 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
