 | | Re: Call for Nominations: 2005 LDraw.org Steering Committee
|
|
(...) I think he's done an excellent job, I will second your nomination. -Leonard Hoffman (20 years ago, 6-Jan-05, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Call for Nominations: 2005 LDraw.org Steering Committee
|
|
(...) Since they’ve done a decent job (IMO), I’d like to re-nominate the current members, including... Chris Dee -gyug (20 years ago, 6-Jan-05, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Call for Nominations: 2005 LDraw.org Steering Committee
|
|
(...) Since they've done a decent job (IMO), I'd like to re-nominate the current members, including... Kevin Clague -gyug (20 years ago, 6-Jan-05, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Call for Nominations: 2005 LDraw.org Steering Committee
|
|
(...) Since they've done a decent job (IMO), I'd like to re-nominate the current members, including... Larry Pieniazek -gyug (20 years ago, 6-Jan-05, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Call for Nominations: 2005 LDraw.org Steering Committee
|
|
(...) Since they've done a decent job (IMO), I'd like to re-nominate the current members, including... Orion Pobursky -gyug (20 years ago, 6-Jan-05, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Call for Nominations: 2005 LDraw.org Steering Committee
|
|
(...) Since they've done a decent job (IMO), I'd like to re-nominate the current members, starting with Tim Courtney. (20 years ago, 6-Jan-05, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw, FTX)
|
| |
| | Call for Nominations: 2005 LDraw.org Steering Committee
|
|
Per the LDraw.org Bylaws, Subsection 6.03(a), the 2004 Steering Committee hereby calls for the community to nominate individuals as candidates for the 2005 Steering Committee. Please post nominations in response to this message. Nominations will be (...) (20 years ago, 6-Jan-05, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw, FTX) !!
|
| |
| | Re: The LDraw.org Contributer Agreement
|
|
(...) I think this hasn't been totally decided yet; the last I heard, SteerCo was still discussing it amongst itself. The two front-runner options are: 1. Possibly have two separate distros, one for 'compliant' and one for 'non-compliant'. The (...) (20 years ago, 4-Jan-05, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: The LDraw.org Contributer Agreement
|
|
(...) So far it only looks like you're blocked from uploading new parts until you do, but i guess that doesn't apply to orphan parts. -NB (20 years ago, 3-Jan-05, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: The LDraw.org Contributer Agreement
|
|
(...) just out of curiosity. what will happen if: * an author does NOT agree * an author does NOT reply will his/her parts be deleted from the library and do we have to recreate them? w. (20 years ago, 2-Jan-05, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: The LDraw.org Contributer Agreement
|
|
(...) Woot! Good work guys! -gyug (20 years ago, 1-Jan-05, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | The LDraw.org Contributer Agreement
|
|
The LDraw.org Steering Committee is pleased to announce that the Jessiman family has given their consent to go forward with the LDraw.org Contributors Agreement. For those who don't remember, here is a link to the current version of the Contributor (...) (20 years ago, 31-Dec-04, to lugnet.announce, lugnet.cad, lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw) !!
|
| |
| | Re: more detailed Status (of File) in Parts Tracker?
|
|
(...) And in the past, I believe replies have universally disagreed with your position. Just to be clear, let me restate my position: Blindly ignoring unofficial fixes to subfiles would allow the PT to certify files for release that reviewers would (...) (20 years ago, 29-Dec-04, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | more detailed Status (of File) in Parts Tracker?
|
|
Happy Holidays, Y'all! :D I have brought up, in the past, a point of concern I have with the Status displayed by the Parts Tracker. I have believed, and continue to believe, that a file's Status should be calculated *independently* of whatever (...) (20 years ago, 28-Dec-04, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: Brick 1 x 6 x 5 with Rocket Launch Pattern – RELOADED
|
|
(...) Thanks for the reminder about that! I always forget. Still, a quick "ya we're discussing it" followed by a "what do people think" here doesn't hurt. (20 years ago, 17-Dec-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts, lugnet.cad, lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: Brick 1 x 6 x 5 with Rocket Launch Pattern – RELOADED
|
|
(...) The LSC mailing list archives are public and a link to them can be found here: (URL) we're not completely out in the open (i.e. discussing policy on Lugnet), our discussions are available for any one who wants to follow along. -Orion (20 years ago, 17-Dec-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts, lugnet.cad, lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: Brick 1 x 6 x 5 with Rocket Launch Pattern – RELOADED
|
|
(...) Hopefully the latter. I did not intend to have any condescending tone in there at all! I'm talking about appropriate process. If you read it in there I must not have done a very good job of communicating and I apologise. Either that or you're (...) (20 years ago, 17-Dec-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts, lugnet.cad, lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: Brick 1 x 6 x 5 with Rocket Launch Pattern – RELOADED
|
|
(...) Actually your (and any other non-LSC member's) input is not wothless and actually has a great influence on what decides. We decided when the LSC first formed that we wouldn't do anything without at least discussing the pros and cons with the (...) (20 years ago, 17-Dec-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts, lugnet.cad, lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: Brick 1 x 6 x 5 with Rocket Launch Pattern – RELOADED
|
|
(...) Yeah, I got the blinking error message in preview and still posted it. I couldn't figure out the problem. Sorry, It must be the .bmp thing. I didn't think of that because they were only 8k apiece, but I can see why you'd want to avoid the (...) (20 years ago, 17-Dec-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts, lugnet.cad, lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: Brick 1 x 6 x 5 with Rocket Launch Pattern – RELOADED
|
|
In lugnet.cad.dat.parts, Don Heyse wrote: (switched to plain text for clarity) Don, I don't think your FTX image embed worked. Did it work when you used preview (you DID use preview, I am sure)? If it did, there's a technical problem somewhere... (...) (20 years ago, 17-Dec-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts, lugnet.cad, lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: Brick 1 x 6 x 5 with Rocket Launch Pattern – RELOADED
|
|
(...) Sorry I'm a bit late to the party (been on vacation) but I think you should submit it. It looks good enough for me. Actually I think it's too good not to submit. Compare your part (as seen in LDRAW): (URL) And this official part (as seen in (...) (20 years ago, 17-Dec-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts, lugnet.cad, lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Who Uses Original LDraw? (Was: ... Rocket Launch Pattern)
|
|
(...) We're doing everything we can to secure that, behind the scenes, although we don't yet have it, it's only a communication issue, we're pretty sure. I'd rather not go into more detail than that for privacy reasons. (...) That's a key point. We (...) (20 years ago, 13-Dec-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts, lugnet.cad, lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: Who Uses Original LDraw? (Was: ... Rocket Launch Pattern)
|
|
(...) Having an official reference implemention would put us in a better position in several ways. For the parts library, we could resolve a number of nagging issues, like the dithered-colors-have...e-subfiled restriction. For the rendering (...) (20 years ago, 13-Dec-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts, lugnet.cad, lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: Who Uses Original LDraw? (Was: ... Rocket Launch Pattern)
|
|
(...) You have some valid points here but I want to respond to this one specifically. The copyright decision has been made. It was finalized a month and a half ago. What are we waiting for? We're are waiting for consent from the Jessiman's to go (...) (20 years ago, 13-Dec-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts, lugnet.cad, lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: Who Uses Original LDraw? (Was: ... Rocket Launch Pattern)
|
|
(...) I never knew James; I became aware of LDraw a long time after he has passed away. I have no idea what would be best for the file system, the prog, to honour his accomplishments ... actually I don't care about much. I'm not very good in this (...) (20 years ago, 13-Dec-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts, lugnet.cad, lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: Who Uses Original LDraw? (Was: ... Rocket Launch Pattern)
|
|
(...) Excellent point. However there are a lot of (in some ways incompatible) dialects of C. There ARE reference implementations for things like all the Java components (the javac compiler, the java jvm, the jms messaging, jca, the rmi server, etc (...) (20 years ago, 13-Dec-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts, lugnet.cad, lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: Who Uses Original LDraw? (Was: ... Rocket Launch Pattern)
|
|
(...) Why have a replacement at all? The file format stands by itself. There's no reference complier for C code, no reference viewer for the PNG format, and no reference CAD program for the DXF format, why should there be one for the LDraw system? (...) (20 years ago, 12-Dec-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts, lugnet.cad, lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: Who Uses Original LDraw? (Was: ... Rocket Launch Pattern)
|
|
(...) IIRC, the limit was only on the size of the root directory -- but I could well be wrong. I think there are two separate, and related, questions here: Do we want to keep supporting DOS as a platform? Do we want to keep supporting LDraw 0.27? (...) (20 years ago, 12-Dec-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts, lugnet.cad, lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Who Uses Original LDraw? (Was: ... Rocket Launch Pattern)
|
|
(...) Willy, You really got a good point here. I don't know if there is anyone that still uses original LDraw. And, I don't think the LDraw parts library is LDraw compatible anyway. At least not running under DOS - I think there was a limit of 2000 (...) (20 years ago, 12-Dec-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts, lugnet.cad, lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Brick 1 x 6 x 5 with Rocket Launch Pattern – RELOADED
|
|
Hi folks, I overhauled the Brick 1 x 6 x 5 with Rocket Launch Pattern - 3754p90.dat. (URL) Although this is the re-engineering of an existing LEGO part, it will NOT be submitted to the LDraw Parts Tracker for certification. It would never make it (...) (20 years ago, 12-Dec-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts, lugnet.cad, lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: LDraw.org's November Model and Scene of the Month Winners
|
|
(...) Well yes, kind of. Since I only get a max of about 2-3 entries per month for each contest, I roll over the non-winning entries until they win or for 3 months. This keeps the field competive and also allows well made entries that may have been (...) (20 years ago, 9-Dec-04, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: LDraw.org's November Model and Scene of the Month Winners
|
|
(...) Am I mistaken in thinking that this month's submissions look remarkably like last month's? Allister (20 years ago, 9-Dec-04, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw, FTX)
|
| |
| | LDraw.org's November Model and Scene of the Month Winners
|
|
Congratulations to the winners of the November Model/Scene of the month contests: Both Model and Scene of the Month were won by Jorgen Andersson (URL) MOTM, Panzer IV H - German Medium Tank> (URL) SOTM, Class V5 diesel pulling boxcars> The voting (...) (20 years ago, 6-Dec-04, to lugnet.announce, lugnet.cad, lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw, FTX)
|
| |
| | LDraw.org's October Model and Scene of the Month Winners
|
|
Congratulations to the winners of the October Model/Scene of the month contests: (URL) MOTM, Set 4450 - P10 steam engine, Ben Beneke> (URL) SOTM, Cityscape 3: Bus Stop in the Summer Sun, Niels Bugge> The voting for the November Model of the Month (...) (20 years ago, 7-Nov-04, to lugnet.announce, lugnet.cad, lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw, FTX)
|
| |
| | LSC Moderator Authentication
|
|
Spam is flooding into my mailbox, forwarded by lsc-request at ld...org. I am required to approve or deny those mails, but I always get the "Authorization failed" message when attempting to. Could somebody fix a working password so I can started? (20 years ago, 6-Nov-04, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: LDraw.org's September Model and Scene of the Month Winners
|
|
(...) Congratulate with the scene Ben, it's really nice and the cows look very cute, but I think you should work a little more with the background, hiding the big concrete field in the background by adding another layer of houses, trees or landscape (...) (20 years ago, 17-Oct-04, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: A small correction to 2004-03 distros
|
|
Gaah! Preview only works, if you work it! ;) (...) There should be a "not" in that line, "would not make". Steve (20 years ago, 15-Oct-04, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | A small correction to 2004-03 distros
|
|
I noticed yesterday that the ldconfig.ldr file included in the current complete.exe/complete.zip distribution files was incorrect, and did not match the file in the lcad0403.exe/lcad0403.zip files. I updated the complete.* files with the newer (...) (20 years ago, 15-Oct-04, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | LDraw.org's September Model and Scene of the Month Winners
|
|
Congratulations to the winners of the September Model/Scene of the month contests: (URL) MOTM, US Sherman M4A3 Tank, Jorgen Andersson> (URL) SOTM, I am a train driver..., Ben Beneke> The voting for the October Model of the Month and Scene of the (...) (20 years ago, 8-Oct-04, to lugnet.announce, lugnet.cad, lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw, FTX)
|
| |
| | LDraw.org Downtime
|
|
Per the following post: (URL) will be down 10/5 at 2pm EDT for about 15 min. Since Peeron also hosts LDraw.org, LDraw.org will be down as well. -Orion (20 years ago, 4-Oct-04, to lugnet.cad, lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
