Subject:
|
Re: LDraw.org Standards Committee (LSC) Draft Proposal
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.cad.dev
|
Date:
|
Thu, 1 May 2003 15:36:50 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1061 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.cad.dev, Wayne Gramlich wrote:
[snip]
> If the LDraw.Org community is really concerned that the LSC will make
> a bogus proposal, I would recommend formalizing "final comments"
> instead of "ratification vote." It is way more effective.
I think this sounds like an effective check on 'committees gone wild'.
I would definitely support implementation of this process.
Steve
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: LDraw.org Standards Committee (LSC) Draft Proposal
|
| (...) All: While a ratification vote is fairly common for technical committee proposals, I don't think I've ever heard of a ratification vote that did not sustain a technical committee's recommendation. If a technical committee is doing the wrong (...) (22 years ago, 24-Apr-03, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
26 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
