To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.cad.devOpen lugnet.cad.dev in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 CAD / Development / 8842
8841  |  8843
Subject: 
Re: LDraw.org Standards Committee (LSC) Draft Proposal
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.cad.dev
Date: 
Thu, 24 Apr 2003 14:50:48 GMT
Viewed: 
1010 times
  
On Thu, Apr 24, 2003 at 04:27:28AM +0000, Wayne Gramlich wrote:
[snip very good points]

If the LDraw.Org community is really concerned that the LSC will make
a bogus proposal, I would recommend formalizing "final comments"
instead of "ratification vote."  It is way more effective.

Wayne, this is a great idea, and I would support this kind of process.

Dan



Message is in Reply To:
  Re: LDraw.org Standards Committee (LSC) Draft Proposal
 
(...) All: While a ratification vote is fairly common for technical committee proposals, I don't think I've ever heard of a ratification vote that did not sustain a technical committee's recommendation. If a technical committee is doing the wrong (...) (22 years ago, 24-Apr-03, to lugnet.cad.dev)  

26 Messages in This Thread:










Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR