Subject:
|
Re: LDraw.org Standards Committee (LSC) Draft Proposal
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.cad.dev
|
Date:
|
Thu, 24 Apr 2003 16:43:24 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1040 times
|
| |
|
|
On Thu, 24 Apr 2003, Orion Pobursky wrote:
> How about this:
>
> Requirements for LSC Membership
> To ensure only competent, dedicated, and active contributors become members
> of the LSC, they shall have met one or more of the following requirements:
>
> - Authored an LDraw part subsequently released in an Official LDraw.org
> Parts Update
> - Served as a reviewer on the Parts Tracker through at least 2 official
> parts updates, and posted at least 5 reviews per update
> - Authored a software program that is compliant with either the LDraw .2.7
> spec or another spec published by the LSC
> - Been nominated for membership by at least 2 members of the current LSC
Every time I've seen Qualification 2, I've thought it needed
clarification. How about:
"Served as a reviewer on the Parts Tracker and posted at least 5 reviews
for each of at least 2 official updates."
After all, just because someone only posted four reviews during his first
two months as a reviewer, or took a few months off at some point,
shouldn't be a reason to disqualify him from the LSC.
--
TWS Garrison
http://www.math.purdue.edu/~tgarriso/
Remove capital letters in address for direct reply.
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: LDraw.org Standards Committee (LSC) Draft Proposal
|
| (...) How about this: Requirements for LSC Membership To ensure only competent, dedicated, and active contributors become members of the LSC, they shall have met one or more of the following requirements: - Authored an LDraw part subsequently (...) (21 years ago, 24-Apr-03, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
26 Messages in This Thread:
 
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
