Subject:
|
Re: LDraw.org Standards Committee (LSC) Draft Proposal
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.cad.dev
|
Date:
|
Wed, 23 Apr 2003 20:52:26 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
827 times
|
| |
|
|
On Wed, Apr 23, 2003 at 08:25:01PM +0000, Dan Boger wrote:
> Here's my revision to the draft. I think it makes it simpler, while retaining
> the key details. If anyone's interested, I can try to post a marked up
> version, with the changes underlined.
here's a (manually) marked up version:
http://peeron.com/tmp/lsc06a.html
Dan
|
|
Message has 6 Replies:
 | | Re: LDraw.org Standards Committee (LSC) Draft Proposal
|
| If I might ask a question... I see that this whole project is geared specificly toward Lego uses of the program. From my understanding, it will not be restricted to just Lego uses. Clone brands, as well as other things (there is a couple of block (...) (21 years ago, 23-Apr-03, to lugnet.cad.dev)
| | | Re: LDraw.org Standards Committee (LSC) Draft Proposal
|
| (...) what the differences are, which is a good thing. How did you generate it? (I know your aversion to MS and suspect you didn't use MS Word for the generation :) ) Hopefully some automatic way so we can be sure all the differences are (...) (21 years ago, 24-Apr-03, to lugnet.cad.dev)
| | | Re: LDraw.org Standards Committee (LSC) Draft Proposal
|
| "Dan Boger" <dan@peeron.com> wrote in message news:20030423205226....ron.com... (...) retaining (...) I have been watching this thread from the sidelines. While I use a number of the tools (notably ML-CAD, L3P, L3PAO, LDAO, and LPub) I would not (...) (21 years ago, 24-Apr-03, to lugnet.cad.dev)
| | | Re: LDraw.org Standards Committee (LSC) Draft Proposal
|
| (...) All: While a ratification vote is fairly common for technical committee proposals, I don't think I've ever heard of a ratification vote that did not sustain a technical committee's recommendation. If a technical committee is doing the wrong (...) (21 years ago, 24-Apr-03, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: LDraw.org Standards Committee (LSC) Draft Proposal
|
| (...) I think it had many good ideas in it, indeed! (...) While I agree in general, I think the leadership of LDraw.org should not be part of this proposal. The LSC can easily start it's work, while the community works out the whole official org (...) (21 years ago, 23-Apr-03, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
26 Messages in This Thread:
  
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
