Subject:
|
Re: Test posting of "Unoffficial Update"
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.cad.dev
|
Date:
|
Tue, 8 May 2001 16:47:06 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
604 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.cad.dev, Dave Schuler writes:
> I'm jumping in late here, so I may have missed a vital point, but wouldn't
> a blank space at the beginning of the part description force-sort the part
> to the beginning of parts.lst? I mean, could we have:
>
> 9999.dat Unofficial Part: Brick 2 x 7
> 3001.dat Brick: 2 x 4
>
> or something similar? I realize that longer part descriptions might not
> work with this format, but might this be a fair stop-gap measure?
Maybe. I guess I'd rather not depend on programs treating the title line as
fixed-format, instead of delimited. My code tends to strip extra whitespace
around the 0 and the title.
> Even if we used:
>
> 9999.dat Unofficial Brick 2 x 7
>
> instead of:
>
> 9999.dat Unofficial Part: Brick 2 x 7
We are already using the first format. Unless someone submits a part with a
title like "Part: Brick 2 x 7". ;)
Steve
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Test posting of "Unoffficial Update"
|
| (...) I'm jumping in late here, so I may have missed a vital point, but wouldn't a blank space at the beginning of the part description force-sort the part to the beginning of parts.lst? I mean, could we have: 9999.dat Unofficial Part: Brick 2 x 7 (...) (23 years ago, 8-May-01, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
28 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
