Subject:
|
Re: Test posting of "Unoffficial Update"
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.cad.dev
|
Date:
|
Tue, 8 May 2001 15:41:30 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
439 times
|
| |
|
|
"Steve Bliss" <steve.bliss@home.com> wrote in message
news:dm3gftcj64fh7m1gu018kg1r7huoa6rqdi@4ax.com...
> That falls under the category of 'no review of the parts before release'. • Those
> parts already had the '(Un-Official)' on their title.
>
> Part names are limited to 64 characters.
OK, that's great. I thought I'd bring it up just in case there was a problem
with code somewhere. At least this update will make it very obvious that
it's unofficial :)
Dan
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Test posting of "Unoffficial Update"
|
| I like my @-sign better. It only takes one character, and it puts them first in the parts list (if sorted by description, of course). I recall that someone used another character, but which one is not important. Just my 50-öring. /Tore (...) (23 years ago, 8-May-01, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Test posting of "Unoffficial Update"
|
| (...) It was a direct suggestion to mark the parts all as unofficial, to make it easier to remove them later (after another official release). (...) That falls under the category of 'no review of the parts before release'. Those parts already had (...) (23 years ago, 8-May-01, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
28 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
