Subject:
|
Re: Test posting of "Unoffficial Update"
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.cad.dev
|
Date:
|
Tue, 8 May 2001 16:00:49 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
530 times
|
| |
|
|
I like my @-sign better. It only takes one character, and it puts them first in
the parts list (if sorted by description, of course). I recall that someone used
another character, but which one is not important.
Just my 50-öring.
/Tore
Daniel Crichton wrote:
> "Steve Bliss" <steve.bliss@home.com> wrote in message
> news:dm3gftcj64fh7m1gu018kg1r7huoa6rqdi@4ax.com...
>
> > That falls under the category of 'no review of the parts before release'. • Those
> > parts already had the '(Un-Official)' on their title.
> >
> > Part names are limited to 64 characters.
>
> OK, that's great. I thought I'd bring it up just in case there was a problem
> with code somewhere. At least this update will make it very obvious that
> it's unofficial :)
>
> Dan
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Test posting of "Unoffficial Update"
|
| (...) Hmmm. Maybe you're right, for the short term. But putting Unofficial on the front of the name makes it clear for everyone. Most people wouldn't know what the @-sign means. Long-term, I want to use this 'unofficial release' page as (at least) a (...) (23 years ago, 8-May-01, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Test posting of "Unoffficial Update"
|
| "Steve Bliss" <steve.bliss@home.com> wrote in message news:dm3gftcj64fh7m1...4ax.com... (...) Those (...) OK, that's great. I thought I'd bring it up just in case there was a problem with code somewhere. At least this update will make it very (...) (23 years ago, 8-May-01, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
28 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
