 | | Re: "All zeros" warning (Was: Parts Tracker Activity Page)
|
|
(...) Yes, I believe they are. I haven't rechecked lately to see if anything has changed. If I get a chance in the next few days I will recheck it. (...) I understand and agree. I will cease making any comments on them. (...) really? ok. (...) Paul (23 years ago, 18-Oct-01, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: Parts Tracker - Using L3P-check to scan submitted files
|
|
(...) Looks good. (...) I have used the phrase "0 end of subpart", "0 end of file", etc in some of the parts I have made. Will these get rejected? I usually always try to keep them lowercase. (...) I'm not sure about this one. I feel that new parts (...) (23 years ago, 18-Oct-01, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: Parts Tracker - Using L3P-check to scan submitted files
|
|
Steve: (...) I assume that L3P reports the relevant lines, so it is trivial to remove one of the offending ones. (...) Right. Set a reasonably large threshold (0.1?) and reject based on it. Jacob (23 years ago, 18-Oct-01, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: Parts Tracker - Using L3P-check to scan submitted files
|
|
(...) [snip areas of agreement] (...) Which is sloppy, but not a killer error. (...) I didn't list the non-coplanar message with the "reject" group is because the thresholds of coplanarity are variable, not fixed. So we need to agree on what level (...) (23 years ago, 18-Oct-01, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: Parts Tracker - Using L3P-check to scan submitted files
|
|
Steve: (...) [...] Seems okay. (...) [...] Seems okay. (...) I would say yes. The last two definitely should, since they indicate unneeded resource use. The first one should really be split in to two triangles, if it really is intended to be (...) (23 years ago, 18-Oct-01, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Parts Tracker - Using L3P-check to scan submitted files
|
|
Hey y'all- I'm just sort of starting to get to adding L3P-check'ing to the Parts Tracker submit function. I took a look at the documented messages, and tried to sort them out according to whether or not any particular error was cause to reject a (...) (23 years ago, 17-Oct-01, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: "All zeros" warning (Was: Parts Tracker Activity Page)
|
|
(...) And I want to say "Thank You!" to Paul for doing this -- Lars Hassing has performed a similar service in the past, emailing the L3P messages to part authors. We[1] are in the process of incorporating L3P into the part submission function. I (...) (23 years ago, 17-Oct-01, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: Parts Tracker Activity Page
|
|
(...) I've taken some time away from the process of posting the backlog of parts to the tracker. I will get back to finish the job, but other tasks have higher priorities. Basically, I needed to finish developing the Parts Tracker.[1] It didn't make (...) (23 years ago, 17-Oct-01, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: Parts Tracker Activity Page
|
|
"Steve Bliss" <steve.bliss@home.com> wrote in message news:GLBGz8.12E@lugnet.com... (...) and (...) Are you still going through the parts that had already been submitted prior to the new parts tracker too? Just wondering as the only part I've (...) (23 years ago, 17-Oct-01, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: "All zeros" warning (Was: Parts Tracker Activity Page)
|
|
(...) Ok, I'm the guilty party who posted such notes on the tracker. :) I still pass a part with these errors. Some of my earler parts have these too. L3P issues several "warnings" many are not required to correct to get passed. What I am watching (...) (23 years ago, 17-Oct-01, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: "All zeros" warning (Was: Parts Tracker Activity Page)
|
|
(...) Hmm. I interpret this like the lawyer's question, "Is that when you stopped beating your wife?" It's not really yes or no. The totally accurate answer is: there are no 2D objects in LDraw. The polygons we model are just the 2D surfaces of 3D (...) (23 years ago, 17-Oct-01, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: LDraw History - here's one for the old timers in the group....
|
|
(...) I started working on it in June 96, at that time I had my own set of bricks all hardcoded into the program but a few months later (don't ask me when) I asked James if I could use his .DAT files in LeoCAD and converted them to my own format. (...) (23 years ago, 16-Oct-01, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: LDraw History - here's one for the old timers in the group....
|
|
"Bram Lambrecht" <bram@cwru.edu> wrote in message news:MABBIBJJFOJIOHD...wru.edu... (...) Heheh... (...) Added that you intro'ed the tutorial in Sept 98 (and I will link to it). Snipped cool history tidbits on LDraw/LEdit. (...) It would be neat if (...) (23 years ago, 16-Oct-01, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | "All zeros" warning (Was: Parts Tracker Activity Page)
|
|
WARNING "6260.dat" Line 7: Row 1 all zeros: & 1 16 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 4-4edge.dat Does this mean that we are forced to incorrectly turn 2D objects into quasi-3D to make them pass the tests? /Tore (23 years ago, 16-Oct-01, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Parts Tracker Activity Page
|
|
(XPOST lugnet.cad, FUT lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw) One of the usability challenges I've been having with the new Parts Tracker is knowing what's been going on. There are about 360 active files now[1], and it's hard to see new files and reviews being (...) (23 years ago, 16-Oct-01, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw, lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: Number of parts?
|
|
1589 not counting subparts and primitives. Leonardo ----- Original Message ----- From: "Dave Schuler" <orrex@excite.com> To: <lugnet.cad.dev@lugnet.com> Sent: Tuesday, October 16, 2001 8:34 AM Subject: Number of parts? (...) or (...) (23 years ago, 16-Oct-01, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Number of parts?
|
|
Do we have an official tally of the number of official parts in the LCad library? I would include the multitude of official torsos and decorated elements, but I'm not as curious about the number of official primitives or subparts. Any info will help (...) (23 years ago, 16-Oct-01, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: LDGLite bug reports
|
|
(...) Well, one could think of the orthographic projection as a perspective projection seen from an infinite distance through a telephoto lense (at least that's the way I think of it). I'm not sure that helps me come up with unified coordinate (...) (23 years ago, 15-Oct-01, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: LDGLite bug reports
|
|
Don: (...) The tiling works fine, but it is extremely slow compared to rendering the whole image in one piece. (...) Those notes are quite easy to understand once you find them. ----- (...) Considering that we are considering parallel projections, (...) (23 years ago, 15-Oct-01, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: LDGLite bug reports
|
|
(...) Wow! Lots of bugs reports all at once. Where do I start? I don't know what's up with xvfb the aspect ratio problem. It seems odd since you can reshape an ldglite window and the aspect ratio is handled correctly. I guess I'll have to get xvfb (...) (23 years ago, 15-Oct-01, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
