Subject:
|
Re: Parts Tracker - Using L3P-check to scan submitted files
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw
|
Date:
|
Thu, 18 Oct 2001 07:42:46 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
274 times
|
| |
|
|
Steve:
> Errors that should be rejected:
[...]
Seems okay.
> Not appropriate for part files (also cause rejection):
[...]
Seems okay.
> Errors, but should they cause rejection?:
>
> 2 Vertices not coplanar (%g) Only if -det/-dist option
> 1 Identical to a previous line Line has been seen before (L3P16)
> 1 Identical to line %u Line has been seen before (L3P32)
I would say yes. The last two definitely should, since they
indicate unneeded resource use. The first one should really
be split in to two triangles, if it really is intended to be
non-planar.
> BFC Warnings (don't reject):
[...]
Seems okay.
> Warnings (don't reject):
>
> 0 Color 24 illegal for this line type, using 16 Color 24 not valid for
> linetype 1,3,4
> 1 Lines should not use color 16 Color 16 not valid for linetype 2,5
> 3 Comment lines should have space after 0 Ill-formatted comment like "01 ..."
I would reject on all these three. - And I always thought
that "01" was equivalent to "1" and not to "0".
Jacob
--
ACRONYM: A Contrived Reduction Of Nomenclature Yielding Mnemonics
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
Message is in Reply To:
7 Messages in This Thread:
  
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
