Subject:
|
Re: Parts Tracker - Using L3P-check to scan submitted files
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw
|
Date:
|
Thu, 18 Oct 2001 12:31:02 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
279 times
|
| |
|
|
Steve:
> > I would say yes. The last two definitely should, since they
> > indicate unneeded resource use.
>
> Which is sloppy, but not a killer error.
I assume that L3P reports the relevant lines, so it is
trivial to remove one of the offending ones.
> > The first one should really
> > be split in to two triangles, if it really is intended to be
> > non-planar.
>
> I didn't list the non-coplanar message with the "reject"
> group is because the thresholds of coplanarity are
> variable, not fixed. So we need to agree on what level
> of coplanarity we require.
Right. Set a reasonably large threshold (0.1?) and reject
based on it.
Jacob
--
"It ain't rocket science!"
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
7 Messages in This Thread:
  
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
