 | | Re: WOULD YOU PLEASE...
|
|
(...) I strongly recommend to any part author to also register as a part reviewer. Then at least you can reply comments to votes on your own parts. I am sure you have been listened and your preferences regarding reviewer attitude will be taken into (...) (21 years ago, 7-Jul-03, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: New part - Castle Wall
|
|
(...) It's a little bit risky to make a part only from instruction scans. But never mind it's nearly correct. I'll send you a picture from the bottom. CU Bernd (21 years ago, 7-Jul-03, to lugnet.cad, lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | New part - Castle Wall
|
|
Dear All, I hit on an idea to build CAD model of Royal Knight's Castle from set 6090. In certain moment I found that one part from this set has been never created, so I decided to create it myself. It is a part 6055 named "Castle Wall 6 x 6 x 6 (...) (21 years ago, 7-Jul-03, to lugnet.cad, lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: WOULD YOU PLEASE...
|
|
(...) I can understand you. But I think primitives with are used by a lot of parts should be available to change by anyone. In the other hand a _part_ (or subpart) should never changed if it's on the PT. CU Bernd (21 years ago, 7-Jul-03, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: Torus Primitives on the Part Tracker
|
|
(...) Cool! (...) More cool! (...) the two related part files, neither of which is certified, I'd say go ahead and update t04q3333.dat. (...) Certainly. Steve (21 years ago, 6-Jul-03, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts.primitives)
|
| |
| | Re: WOULD YOU PLEASE...
|
|
[crossposted to lugnet.cad.dev, with followup-to set there as well -- this thread isn't about posting LDR files to lugnet] (...) If anyone is not sure about the general rule/protocol/guidelines on this: for new parts (not fixes), you should *always* (...) (21 years ago, 6-Jul-03, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts, lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: New Primitive Class
|
|
(...) If we can only create outside sections,[1] why not keep the leading t, but change the i/o/q? Maybe x, for extended? As for the ratio decimals in the file name, instead of noting the tube:major ratio (which is >1), use the inverse major:tube (...) (21 years ago, 6-Jul-03, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: WOULD YOU PLEASE...
|
|
(...) Woah, hold it there cowboy. The ONLY fix I will apply to a part not already submitted as a fix would be to slightly adjust the part position. I feel that small and minor errors can be fixed by anyone and would only fly off the handle (ok, I (...) (21 years ago, 6-Jul-03, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | WOULD YOU PLEASE...
|
|
...yes, would you please ask PERMISSION before you mess up my code! Yes I'm angry, but I'm so sick! currently there is spreading a rude behaviour at the PT, especially by the reviewers. grabbing a part and fix an error before an author can get a (...) (21 years ago, 6-Jul-03, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: New Primitive Class
|
|
(...) This topic still needs some approval before we nac move it to finalization. We have been discussing torii(toruses) where the tube radius is equal or greater than the major radius. This only works for the outside sections since the inside (...) (21 years ago, 4-Jul-03, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Torus Primitives on the Part Tracker
|
|
Hello, I have been updating some of the torus primitve files to use quads, and conditional lines instead of cylinder primitves. I have had too many problems getting the cylinder files to show without gaps. I have a new tool that can generate any (...) (21 years ago, 4-Jul-03, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts.primitives)
|
| |
| | PARTS.LST searching. (Was: Re: Part Fix 3959 Space Gun)
|
|
(...) Right now it seems to be listed on the parts tracker as "Bar 1.5L with Handle and Female Stud". I just added a PARTS.LST search capability to ldglite: (URL) there's nothing in that name that would help me narrow the search to find the part. (...) (21 years ago, 3-Jul-03, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts, lugnet.cad.dev)
|
| |
| | Re: Part Fix 3959 Space Gun
|
|
(...) You have to think to the non native english speaking people. So words have mostly both meanings. The UK and the US one. (...) A lot of parts wouldn't be find in the library if the names has such a name. CU Bernd (21 years ago, 3-Jul-03, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: Part Fix 3959 Space Gun
|
|
(...) I'd really rather not. (...) Definitely agree with you there. (...) Argh. This has got to stop. Please, people! The Parts Tracker is not a discussion blog. Don't use it for conversations! (...) I'm not sure where that idea came from. (...) I (...) (21 years ago, 3-Jul-03, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: Part Fix 3959 Space Gun
|
|
(...) I want to reopen this discussion for two reasons. 1) We are having a "discussion" on parts tracker about this part. That's the wrong way to do things, in my view. I placed a hold, the current author responded with counter arguments and we now (...) (21 years ago, 2-Jul-03, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: Is this part available?
|
|
Bummer. Thanks for the info though. -Stefan- (...) (21 years ago, 30-Jun-03, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: Is this part available?
|
|
(...) No, it is not available, not even as unofficial part. - Damien (21 years ago, 30-Jun-03, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Is this part available?
|
|
Hi all, Does anyone know if this part is available in .dat form yet? (URL) (21 years ago, 30-Jun-03, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | New SPORTS Parts on Parts Tracker, needs commenting
|
|
Well, I finally have created some of the parts from the sports sets, specifically two field sections: (URL) 30489> (URL) 30492> They still need some editing (I'd like to change the pivot area from cones to a torus, for example), and in the larger (...) (21 years ago, 30-Jun-03, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Are any of these parts available as .dat files?
|
|
(...) Duuuudde!! That sounds so totally awesome... -Scott (21 years ago, 25-Jun-03, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts, lugnet.inst)
|
| |
| | Re: LDraw-to-Raves (was: POV in Part)
|
|
(...) Hmm, that would be true - if the wrappers use the same names as L3P generates (so the object for the 2x4 brick would be named 3001_dot_dat). Right now, they don't - the names are like ar_3001. Even so, changing '3001_dot_dat' to (...) (21 years ago, 25-Jun-03, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: Are any of these parts available as .dat files?
|
|
(...) Now *that* I can't wait to see!! Jake --- Jake McKee Webmaster - BIP (URL) (21 years ago, 25-Jun-03, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts, lugnet.inst)
|
| |
| | Re: Are any of these parts available as .dat files?
|
|
<snip> (...) Wow, thanks! I really appreciate the hard work that you have put into this. I am in the process of modeling/making insturctions for an MOC that I made of Crush from Finding Nemo. It is built entirely with pieces from 4101 Wild (...) (21 years ago, 25-Jun-03, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: Are any of these parts available as .dat files?
|
|
(...) And now 44301 is on the tracker (URL) its new primitive (URL) (21 years ago, 25-Jun-03, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: LDraw-to-Raves (was: POV in Part)
|
|
In lugnet.cad.dat.parts, Steve Bliss wrote: <snip> (...) I like this quite a bit and if Lar's implements the request I made for L3P to wrap all the part defines in #IFNDEF statments, then these files should be drop in and go --Orion (21 years ago, 25-Jun-03, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | LDraw-to-Raves (was: POV in Part)
|
|
(...) OK, I've generated a complete translation list, matching up as many parts from Anton's library to LDraw as possible. I also worked through the colors/textures/materials, making as many matches as I could. I've started creating POV-Ray include (...) (21 years ago, 25-Jun-03, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: Are any of these parts available as .dat files?
|
|
(...) Actually this one in on the Parts Tracker too. (URL) (21 years ago, 24-Jun-03, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts, FTX)
|
| |
| | sarcophagus/coffin part 30163.dat
|
|
has anyone got a mockup of the sarcophagus (coffin) part? ..joseph g (21 years ago, 23-Jun-03, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: Are any of these parts available as .dat files?
|
|
(...) I have just posted 44302 to the parts tracker (URL) was the easiest of the pair of hinges as it can use the existing clh4 primitive. The single finger part (44301) requires a new truncated primitive. Chris (21 years ago, 21-Jun-03, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: Are any of these parts available as .dat files?
|
|
Thanks, Orion. I guess I'll just get as far as I can, and hope that someome starts work on those other pieces in the near future. -Joel <snip> (21 years ago, 21-Jun-03, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: POV in Part
|
|
(...) The 'dedicating ourselves to one tool' aspect is why I'd rather not allow POV-Ray code to be embedded in official LDraw part files. What I was suggesting was a separate library of POV-Ray parts that was designed from the start to be fully (...) (21 years ago, 21-Jun-03, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: POV in Part
|
|
(...) Are there any significant differences between the two libraries? I assume they both use solid modeling, not surface modeling. I don't think either library offers rounded edges on bricks (something I still miss from the L3G0 library). I've only (...) (21 years ago, 21-Jun-03, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: Are any of these parts available as .dat files?
|
|
(...) (URL) (...) (URL) (...) These ones haven't been made yet as far as I can tell. Plese note that the two files I did reference have hold votes on them and will change before being made official. --Orion (21 years ago, 21-Jun-03, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts, FTX)
|
| |
| | Are any of these parts available as .dat files?
|
|
Hello, I would like to make instructions for a recent MOC of mine, but I'm not sure if .dat files exist for a few of the pieces that I need. If these are available as either official or unofficial files, would someone be kind enough to point me in (...) (21 years ago, 20-Jun-03, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts, FTX)
|
| |
| | New part variant: Slope Brick 45 1 x 2 Double / Inverted Type I [DAT]
|
|
An old mold variant of part 3049 of which I do have at least one copy in the pre ABS-material (Cellulose Acetate, is that the name of the first used material? And for the dutch fellows, how is that material called in dutch?) 0 Slope Brick 45 1 x 2 (...) (21 years ago, 17-Jun-03, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | New part: Train Single Buffer [DAT]
|
|
0 Train Single Buffer 0 Name: x.dat 0 Author: Niels Karsdorp 0 BFC CERTIFY CCW 2 24 -10 0 -28 -10 0 20 2 24 -10 0 20 -10 4 20 2 24 -10 4 20 -10 8 12 2 24 -10 8 12 -10 8 -20 2 24 -10 8 -20 -10 23 -20 2 24 -10 23 -20 -10 23 -28 2 24 -10 23 -28 -10 0 (...) (21 years ago, 17-Jun-03, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: Patterns as subparts?
|
|
(...) Some patterns are like this already (the fire logo comes to mind immediately). However, finding these patterns can be difficult, as they're generally named after the first part that uses them. Could a file naming convention be setup so that (...) (21 years ago, 13-Jun-03, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Patterns as subparts?
|
|
I was thinking that certain patterns that are used often on many diferent pieces could be made into subparts. Something like the clasic space pattern (p90?) could be turned into a subpart and given a name coresponding to the pattern number. (21 years ago, 13-Jun-03, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: POV in Part
|
|
Could folks please trim lugnet.admin.suggestions from this thread? Frank (21 years ago, 11-Jun-03, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts, lugnet.admin.suggestions)
|
| |
| | Re: POV in Part
|
|
(...) Yes, L3P would automatically support new LGEO parts if they were added to the binary l2p_elmt.tab. (...) You can use the -d option to L3P to see the contents of LGEO's *.TAB files: l3p -d -lgeo somefile.dat | more (mentioned a couple of years (...) (21 years ago, 11-Jun-03, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts, lugnet.admin.suggestions)
|
