Subject:
|
Re: WOULD YOU PLEASE...
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.cad.dat.parts
|
Date:
|
Mon, 7 Jul 2003 06:21:51 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1606 times
|
| |
|
|
willy tschager wrote:
> ...yes, would you please ask PERMISSION before you mess up my code!
> Yes I'm angry, but I'm so sick!
>
> currently there is spreading a rude behaviour at the PT, especially
> by the reviewers. grabbing a part and fix an error before an author
> can get a glance on it to see what's wrong. after I have spent weeks
> or even months to design this f*** part don't you think that I also
> can fix a d*** l3P-error. back in the days you kindly asked an author
> if he is willing to rewrite the code, or if you could take the part
> over.
> to my shame I have to admit that at a certain point in the past I
> also snatched some part with hold votes and fixed them without
> permission BUT I took them over only if there hasn't been done any
> work for months. nowadays you get a hold and the next day your part
> has been fixed by the reviewer himself. for myself I returned to ask
> the other authors if they are still interested in the part. living
> this experience on my one was painful enough to making me rethink my
> actions.
I can understand you. But I think primitives with are used by a lot
of parts should be available to change by anyone. In the other hand
a _part_ (or subpart) should never changed if it's on the PT.
CU Bernd
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | WOULD YOU PLEASE...
|
| ...yes, would you please ask PERMISSION before you mess up my code! Yes I'm angry, but I'm so sick! currently there is spreading a rude behaviour at the PT, especially by the reviewers. grabbing a part and fix an error before an author can get a (...) (21 years ago, 6-Jul-03, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
9 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
