 | | Re: x345: Technic Flex System Ball Connector (closed)
|
|
(...) Bingo! Thanks Orion! Theres updated versions at (URL) (22 years ago, 28-Jul-02, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: x342: ~Technic Flex-System End
|
|
(...) OK. Updated BFC certified versions now available at (URL) (22 years ago, 28-Jul-02, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: x342: ~Technic Flex-System End
|
|
(...) I agree! "Cable" is much better. I knew that "Wire" was sub-optimal when I wrote the article, but I couldn't come up with a better word at the time. (...) Fredrik (22 years ago, 28-Jul-02, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: x345: Technic Flex System Ball Connector (closed)
|
|
(...) I'm a dummy. I overanalyzed the problem. Here's the solution: The BFC CERTFY statement dosen't have a CW or CCW. If add CW or CCW everything will show up as expected. You still have to fix the bad vertex sequences and row all 0 warnings (...) (22 years ago, 27-Jul-02, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: x342: ~Technic Flex-System End
|
|
(...) 8?) (...) Good idea! But thinking about it, the "aussie" word that works best is probably "cable", so maybe I'll use that. (...) Can do! Only reason its different is because Miguel's connector(s) are oriented that way & I was too lazy to (...) (22 years ago, 27-Jul-02, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: x345: Technic Flex System Ball Connector (closed)
|
|
(...) Hmmm. I tried that with a few quads (I'll fix them all soon) but it made no difference - they're still all blue. ROSCO (22 years ago, 27-Jul-02, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Are these 2 tiles the same pattern?
|
|
Are these two tiles the same pattern? (URL) think they are, but the px2 part shows a handle on the side and 85 in the yellow box that aren't represented in the LDraw rendering p52. All of the tiles I have on hand are px2. If there is a variant like (...) (22 years ago, 27-Jul-02, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: x342: ~Technic Flex-System End
|
|
Very interesting parts! I have a couple of comments, though. Perhaps the name "Technic Flex-System Wire" would be more appropriate? We already have "Technic Flex-System Hose" elements (76.DAT and 77.DAT), so I think that adding "Wire" makes sense. I (...) (22 years ago, 27-Jul-02, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Working on HP Door
|
|
Hi Everyone, Just thought I'd let everyone know I'm working on the Harry Potter door with an arched window. Part #40241 I have completed most of the outline edge lines. Still need to add window and key hole. Will probably take another month to (...) (22 years ago, 27-Jul-02, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: x345: Technic Flex System Ball Connector (closed)
|
|
(...) I found your problem. Run a L3P -check test on your part, all the quads with bad vertex sequence errors will show up as blue under mytest6. Fix the errors with the quads and L3Lab will correctly show eithr red or green. This goes for your (...) (22 years ago, 27-Jul-02, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | x345a: Technic Flex System Ball Connector (open) [DAT]
|
|
x345 with the clip open. Ditto with BFC on this. Also any comments on naming / numbering welcome. ROSCO 0 Technic Flex System Ball Connector (open) 0 Name: x345a.dat 0 Author: Miguel Agullo 0 Unofficial LCad Part 0 Mods: R.Crawford, tidied up 0 BFC (...) (22 years ago, 27-Jul-02, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | x345: Technic Flex System Ball Connector (closed) [DAT]
|
|
This is the first part I've attempted to do BFC on, and I'm confused - how do I decide the winding of type 3 & 4 objects? I switched on mytest6 in L3Lab, and they all display blue. I think I got all the type 1s right tho 8?) Comments? ROSCO 0 (...) (22 years ago, 27-Jul-02, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | x342c01: Technic Flex-System 96LDU Long (open file for usage guide) [DAT]
|
|
See also x342 & x343. I'm not sure about the naming & numbering on this one - its set up the same as 75, 76 & 77 flex elements. I was considering not making x343 a part, asit only contains 1 line, but it gives the part the correct scale, and makes (...) (22 years ago, 27-Jul-02, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | x343: ~Technic Flex-System Segment [DAT]
|
|
see also x342 & x342c01 0 ~Technic Flex-System Segment 0 Name: x343.dat 0 Author: Ross Crawford 0 Unofficial LCAD Part 1 16 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 2 0 -1 0 4-4CYLI.DAT 0 (22 years ago, 27-Jul-02, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | x342: ~Technic Flex-System End [DAT]
|
|
See also x343 and x342c01 0 ~Technic Flex-System End 0 Name: x342.dat 0 Author: Ross Crawford 0 Unofficial LCAD Part 1 16 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 2 0 -1 0 4-4DISC.DAT 1 16 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 2 0 -1 0 4-4EDGE.DAT 1 16 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 2 0 4 0 4-4CYLI.DAT 1 16 0 (...) (22 years ago, 27-Jul-02, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: Could someone tell me what this is?
|
|
Ronald, I have a picture of the hollow stud cones on my mold-variant comparison page: (URL) you know of any other part variations, please let me know. I'm always searching for more pictures for my collections. Sorry, I can't help you with the (...) (22 years ago, 26-Jul-02, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: Could someone tell me what this is?
|
|
(...) I think you've got part 4168, 'Train Signal Mast'. (...) These parts have appeared in two sets (or three, depending on how you count). One is <set:4564 Freight Rail Runner>, the other is a recycling truck. You can see the part in use here (...) (22 years ago, 25-Jul-02, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: Could someone tell me what this is?
|
|
(...) It's way beyond my limited ability to modify other's parts into new ones :). I'm the sort of person that thinks that if Lego made the part, even a variation of an existing part (for instance, I have a 2 x 2 x 2 cone that has an open stud in my (...) (22 years ago, 26-Jul-02, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: Could someone tell me what this is?
|
|
(...) I think this is the part you discriped. I wonder that this hasn't made until now. These are two parts: 1) the sliding hook - 2651 2) the hinge box for the hook - no number, but must be near to the first I'll make this part if nobody else want (...) (22 years ago, 26-Jul-02, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: Could someone tell me what this is?
|
|
Ronald, The dat file is a train signal mast, as mentioned previously. It has been used for other purposes. It is Lego: (URL) second piece doesn't have an official name (Peeron - Boat Hook, Bricklink - Slider Hook). It is used on a town boat to (...) (22 years ago, 26-Jul-02, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: Could someone tell me what this is?
|
|
(...) Have a look at the following: (URL) this particular model it is a loading ramp for the race cars. I believe I've also seen it used as a crossing guard for a train crossing (...) Have alook at: (URL)Any ideas? I will try to post a scan of it (...) (22 years ago, 26-Jul-02, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: Could someone tell me what this is?
|
|
(...) This part is almost certainly Official LDRAW part# 4168.dat Train Signal Mast (...) Hmmm... It's pretty difficult to guess without some kind of visual. The way you describe it does sound quite familiar ... You're probably right; it goes on a (...) (22 years ago, 26-Jul-02, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: Could someone tell me what this is?
|
|
(...) I snipped the DAT text for berevity. I recognize the piece as being one that Lego makes. I know I've seen pictures of that piece being used as the post of some industrial-area-looking streetlamps. I believe you'll find it in some of the train (...) (22 years ago, 25-Jul-02, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | star wars hood
|
|
Is this piece avaiable? unoffically or offically? -AHui (22 years ago, 25-Jul-02, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Could someone tell me what this is? [DAT]
|
|
I *THINK* this is a genuine Lego part. It has the same physical thickness of a plate and the 'X's match up with the 1 x 4 x 1 Fence (which is what I used to make this). The material seems to be the same quality of Lego and the color matches the Lego (...) (22 years ago, 25-Jul-02, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: Part Fix 3959 Space Gun
|
|
(...) Yes, "Torch" is best to cover both horizontal usage and vertical usage. It has been used as a flashlight but mostly in my imagination as I can't exibit a 1980s town set proving that. Personnaly, I view it as a flashlight in any space set. It (...) (22 years ago, 24-Jul-02, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: Updated 30399.dat
|
|
(...) I'm alright with this name, but I'd like to hear what other people think. (...) Yes. (...) Email parts@ldraw.org and ask for one. :) (...) It can take awhile for parts to be processed, considering the number of files on the tracker, and the (...) (22 years ago, 24-Jul-02, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: How do I submit this part?
|
|
(...) To submit a part, email it to parts@ldraw.org. Steve (22 years ago, 24-Jul-02, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | How do I submit this part? [DAT]
|
|
I posted this a long time ago, but it's not in the tracker. 0 Plate 4 x 4 without Corner 0 Name: 30503.dat 0 Author: Ronald Scott Moody <RonaldScottMoody@netscape.net> 0 Unofficial Element 0 1 16 10 4 10 1 0 0 0 -1 0 0 0 1 stud4.dat 1 16 10 4 30 1 0 (...) (22 years ago, 24-Jul-02, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Updated 30399.dat [DAT]
|
|
I have fixed the duplicated lines according to L3P. Is this the correct name? Also, do I need to submit this to the tracker? If so, how do I get an account? I hope this one is correct, I don't think any of the parts that I have made have been OK'd. (...) (22 years ago, 24-Jul-02, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Updated 30400.dat [DAT]
|
|
I fixed this one's duplicated lines as well. 0 Brick 4 x 18 0 Name: 30400.dat 0 Author: Ronald Scott Moody <RonaldScottMoody@netscape.net> 0 Unofficial Element 0 1 16 120 4 20 1 0 0 0 -5 0 0 0 1 stud4.dat 1 16 160 4 20 1 0 0 0 -5 0 0 0 1 stud4.dat 1 (...) (22 years ago, 24-Jul-02, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: New Part in progress - Baseplate 32 x 32 with Craters
|
|
(...) Wow! I think you've definitely got sufficient detail there. (...) If you include a comment in the part file, indicating that the bottom is modeled as a flat surface to reduce the size/complexity of the part, I think that would be alright. (...) (22 years ago, 24-Jul-02, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: Part Fix 3959 Space Gun
|
|
(...) I'm not sure if this needs realy torii. I can live with cones because the details are so fine that it's not neccassary to use torii. For the name I suggest "Minifig Torch". It's a understandable name. Space gun is to one-sided. 0 Minifig Torch (...) (22 years ago, 24-Jul-02, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: Part Fix 3959 Space Gun [DAT]
|
|
I redid the part using torus primitives. I think it looks better w/ torii for the handle and cones for the large end cylinder. Also, the large end torii would look a little better if I had a t0401250 primitive but I couldn't find one. As for the (...) (22 years ago, 23-Jul-02, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: Part Fix 3959 Space Gun
|
|
(...) Ha! :) That's a very good idea, IMO. Although many US'ians won't get the possible double-reference. Err, this part *has* been used as a flashlight, right? Steve (22 years ago, 23-Jul-02, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: Part Fix 3959 Space Gun
|
|
(...) Sorry, I made a stupid confusion with part 4349. My proposal name for 3959 is "Minifig Torch". Damien (22 years ago, 23-Jul-02, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: Part Fix 3959 Space Gun
|
|
(...) Why not "Minifig Loudhailer" ? It applies to both town and space themes and is certainly the initial intent of TLG. Damien (22 years ago, 23-Jul-02, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: New Part in progress - Baseplate 32 x 32 with Craters
|
|
Oh, my! Most impressive. :-D (22 years ago, 23-Jul-02, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: Part Fix 3959 Space Gun
|
|
(...) If I'm remembering the part right (sorry, I don't have one handy), I'd definitely want to use torii for the ribs. If you ask Paul Easter nicely, he might generate the file for you. (...) No ideas here, and I've been thinking about it for over (...) (22 years ago, 23-Jul-02, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: Part Fix 3959 Space Gun
|
|
(...) Tough call. . .the Bar hierarchy makes the most sense from a geometrical standpoint, but this seems like a Minifig Accessory. BTW, shouldn't there be a keyword "torch", since that is, in fact, what most Castle folks would recognize it as? (...) (22 years ago, 23-Jul-02, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
