Subject:
|
Re: New Part in progress - Baseplate 32 x 32 with Craters
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.cad.dat.parts
|
Date:
|
Wed, 24 Jul 2002 14:31:52 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1498 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.cad.dat.parts, Willy Tschager wrote:
> have a look at the "beta-version" of the part I'm currently working on and tell me what do you think. any suggestions and critical
> statements are welcome, but please consider that some areas still need a lot of refinement. especially the two ends have to be
> remade from scratch. it particularly interests me if the definition of the mesh is high enough.
>
> http://space.tin.it/io/wtschage/craters_1.jpg (39 KB) - render
> http://space.tin.it/io/wtschage/craters_2.jpg (55 KB) - render
> http://space.tin.it/io/wtschage/craters_3.jpg (51 KB) - render
> http://space.tin.it/io/wtschage/craters_4.jpg (50 KB) - render
> http://space.tin.it/io/wtschage/craters_5.jpg (25 KB) - render
> http://space.tin.it/io/wtschage/craters_6.gif (33 KB) - mesh
Wow! I think you've definitely got sufficient detail there.
> another critical point is the bottom of the baseplate. to keep the file at a reasonable size I would prefer a closed version, where
> the bottom doesn't mirror the top. someone could argument that the bottom in the original lego® part reassembles the profile of the
> hill but even a rough mesh would result in some 1000 to 2000 triangles (well, how much MB ram does your computer have? ;-)
If you include a comment in the part file, indicating that the bottom is
modeled as a flat surface to reduce the size/complexity of the part, I
think that would be alright.
Steve
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
8 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
