Subject:
|
Re: Tim visits the Model Shop (was: Re: The Artemis Project)
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.cad
|
Date:
|
Fri, 25 Aug 2000 22:43:05 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
970 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.cad, Steve Bliss writes:
> In lugnet.cad, Tim Courtney wrote:
>
> > As far as parts naming conventions (this opens up another whole can of worms)
> > pretty much, they aren't going to be changing theirs (I suggested
> > interfacing the LCAD and TLC naming conventions), so somewhere along
> > the line we will have to adopt their convention if we want to be compatible
> > (big IF).
>
> A couple problems with this:
>
> 1. Do you have any reason to think that they will ever *tell* us what their
> names are? Not just one or two at a time, but releasing the entire list.
>
> 2. As I understand it (not having seen most of their part names), TLC
> doesn't have *a* standard for naming parts. With LDraw, we're making an
> effort to use names that are consistent, easy to reference (once you're
> used to our methods), and standardized. I'd hate to lose that, just to
> adhere to an inferior (usability-wise) 'official' source.
>
> > Their English
> > naming convention often comes from direct translations from the Danish, and
> > when you deal with direct translations you don't always get the best word in
> > the second language.
>
> Yah. And translated names change occasionally.
>
> > The guy there said he even started renaming some of the
> > LDraw parts to conform to TLC's naming convention - because that's what he • was
> > used to. I neglected to ask him whether he used the English translation or
> > the Danish.
I can absolutely confirm that Legos Danish-to-English part name translations
dont usually come out very well from my work on the Technic parts registry.
It used to be that I tried very hard to get "official" Lego names for all of
the parts in the registry (and the registry is still at least 50% US Lego
translations from the Danish) but finally gave up when I realized that my
own names were much more descriptive.
From what I have been able to gather names are typically standardized to a
short 'run' of similar pieces (maybe 3 or 4). Another major problem with Lego's
nomenclature is that several pieces will have exactly the same name (I know
of at least 5 different Technic pieces called simply 'steering gear'.
Now I cant say that I always agree with the LDraw part names I still think
you are better off making Lego standardize to YOUR names.
--Jim
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Tim visits the Model Shop (was: Re: The Artemis Project)
|
| (...) So, what did he say about MLCad / LDraw? Did he make any comments comparing TLC's software to LCAD? Does he do stuff in MLCad because he enjoys it, or just as a matter of keeping aware of what's going on? (...) Drat! One thing I like about (...) (24 years ago, 25-Aug-00, to lugnet.cad)
|
29 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
