Subject:
|
Re: Conditional Ring primitive?
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.cad
|
Date:
|
Fri, 12 Dec 2008 19:54:06 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
6417 times
|
| |
|
|
> But if you prove me wrong and find a way...
Mmhhh... maybe by setting 2 conditional rings on the junction. Each condring
would be set between a cylinder and a cone. Scaling the ring would adapt to
various cone slopes. Of course 2 rings would be needed, one for converging
cones, one for diverging ones.
What do you think (except that I'm clear as mud...)
Philo
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Conditional Ring primitive?
|
| (...) It sounds like it would work, but I'm not sure if people would go for it. Of course, if the POTM competitions are anything to go by, you're making a majority of the complicated parts right now, so if you go with it, that's probably all we need (...) (16 years ago, 12-Dec-08, to lugnet.cad)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Conditional Ring primitive?
|
| (...) That's a primitive I have been longing for... but I realized it is impossible to build: where would you put the control lines? The top control points would need to be scaled differently from bottom ones to match various cylinders/cones (...) (16 years ago, 12-Dec-08, to lugnet.cad)
|
39 Messages in This Thread:
 
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
