Subject:
|
Conditional Ring primitive?
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.cad
|
Date:
|
Fri, 12 Dec 2008 19:16:48 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
6718 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.cad, Travis Cobbs wrote:
> I realized while investigating this that there is another problem in my curve
> smoothing that I have always been aware of, but forgot to mention. Smoothing
> between primitives doesn't work when primitive substitution is enabled. There
> are things I may be able to do to fix that, though; I'll investigate the
> performance implications. So while it smooths properly with the precision set
> to 0.01 with primitive substitution disabled, it doesn't smooth properly with
> primitive substitution enabled.
I just noticed something else while investigating a fix for the above problem.
The above model could really use a circular conditional edge primitive. I would
vote for x-ycedge.dat as the filename (ie 1-4cedge.dat, 4-4cedge.dat,
1-16cedge.dat). What are people's thoughts on adding that?
--Travis
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Conditional Ring primitive?
|
| (...) That's a primitive I have been longing for... but I realized it is impossible to build: where would you put the control lines? The top control points would need to be scaled differently from bottom ones to match various cylinders/cones (...) (16 years ago, 12-Dec-08, to lugnet.cad)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Colinear Vertices
|
| (...) I played with the settings, and I had to set the precision all the way down to 0.133 in order to get it to fully smooth. (0.125 failed to smooth properly.) (...) .005. I think I'll set the precision to .01, to hopefully give it some leeway. I (...) (16 years ago, 12-Dec-08, to lugnet.cad)
|
39 Messages in This Thread:
 
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
