Subject:
|
Re: Questions about LPub
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.cad
|
Date:
|
Sun, 29 May 2005 03:03:30 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1096 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.cad, Philippe Hurbain wrote:
> > It is good you found a workaround, but I want to fix the LPub bug.
>
> Good luck, I guess that the overall code is quite involved!
>
> The last problem remaining for me (the results I have so far are very good!) is
> the step number placement:
> > Also on layout 3, I'd like to put step numbers in bottom left corner, to avoid
> > callout hide. But the more I change the
> > 0 LPUB STEP_NUMBER PLACEMENT RIGHT BOTTOM 0 0 STEP_IMAGE
> > line the more it stays the same :-(
> Any idea?
I'll wrestle with it.
>
> Something on the documentation too:
> - I found no information on CALLOUT VERTICAL|HORIZONTAL, got this only in your
> Pedmatic instructions...
> - CALLOUT ROW_FIRST (step ranges) is shown in an example of the documentation,
> but is not explained
I have to kill that example.
>
> ...and some wishes:
> - Debugging and fine-tuning layouts placements can be tedious. It would save
> time to be able to re-generate layouts for only a small range of pages instead
> of all.
Reasonable.
> - in the same vein, I suppose that the generation of POV files is not useful for
> LDgLite (or LDview) renderings... LDgLite is so fast (thanks, Don!) that it
> takes significant time...
L3P is required for LDView and ldglite to help me understand the camera distance
needed.
>
> Philo
Kevin
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Questions about LPub
|
| (...) Good luck, I guess that the overall code is quite involved! The last problem remaining for me (the results I have so far are very good!) is the step number placement: (...) Any idea? Something on the documentation too: - I found no information (...) (19 years ago, 28-May-05, to lugnet.cad)
|
37 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
