 | | Re: Proposed changes to MOTM Submission guidelines
|
|
(...) of course not. Prior to this thread being posted on lugnet. [snip] (...) Opinions voiced in a private discussion ARE irrelavent once the discussion goes public. If the owners of the opinions want to share them, they're welcome to do so (and (...) (21 years ago, 6-Jan-04, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: Proposed changes to MOTM Submission guidelines
|
|
(...) I hope not. It's certainly not my overt intent! I think sharing's great, if you want to share. I just don't want to see authors put in a position where they are forced to share either to participate at all, or in order to be on an equal (...) (21 years ago, 6-Jan-04, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: Proposed changes to MOTM Submission guidelines
|
|
(...) It would seem like you are defending here your right to sell your models *over* the rights of others to share theirs. Granted, this only applies to a very specific instance (MOTM contest), not the community as a whole. But I still can't agree (...) (21 years ago, 6-Jan-04, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: Proposed changes to MOTM Submission guidelines
|
|
(...) Well, more kudos to Orion for opening the discussion then, even if it got off-topic. I have not changed my views on the matter, but at the same I have certainly gained insight into the mindset of other community members. At the end of the day, (...) (21 years ago, 6-Jan-04, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Message to Paul Easter
|
|
(...) It must be because of my ISP's new email filters. Make sure your message says something like "ldraw" or "lugnet". They should make it through then. If not, I have emailed you using my backup email address. Paul (21 years ago, 6-Jan-04, to lugnet.cad.dat.parts)
|
| |
| | Re: *** LDView Version 2.1 Released ***
|
|
(...) I went and looked, and found a couple of things. On video cards with good OpenGL support, it only loads the model once, but it compiles the model twice. I'll have this fixed in the next version. (You can tell if you have one of these video (...) (21 years ago, 6-Jan-04, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: Proposed changes to MOTM Submission guidelines
|
|
(...) But not allowing it discriminates against larger or more detailed entries. Take a look at the December models. There's no way to see all the details of two of the models without the LDR file. You're just leveling the field in your favor (...) (21 years ago, 6-Jan-04, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: Proposed changes to MOTM Submission guidelines
|
|
(...) I am not so keen on it, it sort of smacks of potential discrimination against entries that choose not to do so. If we are going for a level playing field let's get completely level. (21 years ago, 6-Jan-04, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: Proposed changes to MOTM Submission guidelines
|
|
(...) Well that wasn't just me. Steve and I had discussed it for some time and had wanted to move in that direction. The change actually got a bit of help from Michael Lachmann who asked, and Steve and I gave a thumbs up, then others followed suit. (...) (21 years ago, 6-Jan-04, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: *** LDView Version 2.1 Released ***
|
|
(...) You're welcome. As an aside to other users that have feature ideas, I believe that Willy suggested/requested all of the above. I tend to be fairly arbitrary about which feature requests get implemented and which ones don't (I'm more likely to (...) (21 years ago, 5-Jan-04, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: *** LDView Version 2.1 Released ***
|
|
(...) I have no problem doing this. Not sure how big the file will be at the moment, since I can't access the repository from work, but I don't mind creating a tgz of the actual repository. I assume by your request that you know how to add the (...) (21 years ago, 5-Jan-04, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: Proposed changes to MOTM Submission guidelines
|
|
--snip-- (...) Not completely true. Orion's original post was to get ideas/feedback on his proposed changes. In the end it will be up to him to decide how he sets up the MOTM rules. Why? Simple, this decision is not up to a committee! Case in point (...) (21 years ago, 5-Jan-04, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Proposed changes to MOTM Submission guidelines
|
|
(...) How do you feel about requiring the LDR file in order to generate standardized pics, but keeping the publishing of the LDR file itself optional? Would that also prevent you from submitting? (...) I don't buy that analogy. It's not your (...) (21 years ago, 5-Jan-04, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: *** LDView Version 2.1 Released ***
|
|
(...) Hmm, this might just be the excuse I needed to learn a bit about QT. No promises though, I'm easily distracted... (...) What about a tarball or zip file of the LDView portions of your CVS repository? I use a nightly script on the sourceforge (...) (21 years ago, 5-Jan-04, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: *** LDView Version 2.1 Released ***
|
|
(...) Sure. That would be spectacular. For the most part, all the Linux-specific stuff is in the QT directory (I try to keep all the common code cross-platform, but I'm sure there are problems caused by me not actually having compiled in Linux (...) (21 years ago, 5-Jan-04, to lugnet.cad)
|
| |
| | Re: Proposed changes to MOTM Submission guidelines
|
|
"Larry Pieniazek" <lpieniazek@mercator.com> wrote in message news:Hr0Mxq.1qoL@lugnet.com... [ ... snipped ... ] (...) understanding (...) discussions (...) to be (...) necessary. I too think this is an unreasonable restriction. It has been a while (...) (21 years ago, 5-Jan-04, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: Proposed changes to MOTM Submission guidelines
|
|
(...) I was, and still am intending to do exactly this, enter Motm and sell instructions for the MOC. I hope to win MOTM and use the forum to generate publicity. I don't see any problem with this. My MOC is quite large and complicated and I've spent (...) (21 years ago, 5-Jan-04, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: Proposed changes to MOTM Submission guidelines
|
|
(...) Scenes, I guess, as you would think of them now, but some (all?) of them may have been submitted prior to the MoTM/SoTM split. But I've got one in mind for MoTM right now, and I choose MoTM because I think it would be poorly served to be in a (...) (21 years ago, 5-Jan-04, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: Proposed changes to MOTM Submission guidelines
|
|
(...) You're talking about a different medium. Not everyone has the 21 inch, high resolution monitor required to make complex or intricate models look good when rendered. The use of pictures meant to be displayed on a typical computor monitor tends (...) (21 years ago, 5-Jan-04, to lugnet.cad.dev.org.ldraw)
|
| |
| | Re: *** LDView Version 2.1 Released ***
|
|
(...) Are you looking for help with that? (21 years ago, 5-Jan-04, to lugnet.cad)
|
