Subject:
|
Re: Recent Mecha Thoughts
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.build.mecha
|
Date:
|
Wed, 9 Jan 2002 04:15:25 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
370 times
|
| |
| |
In lugnet.build.mecha, Mike Petrucelli writes:
> Mech(a)
You know? I really like that...kinda' covers all the bases no matter which
side of the name argument one favors.
Matt
|
|
Message has 1 Reply: | | Re: Recent Mecha Thoughts
|
| (...) :-) Thats why I wrote it that way. Seriously though I hope no one took my "Real World Viability" rant to mean I did not like all the cool mech(a)s models that get shown here. (Then again I like all the trains and castles too.) -Mike Petrucelli (23 years ago, 9-Jan-02, to lugnet.build.mecha)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Recent Mecha Thoughts
|
| (...) Now this is completly subjective and open to debate. I personally build what most people consider "cute" and/or "little" fighters. To me they are able to kill almost any other fighter or mech(a) with one shot. Hey my "Empire" the Galactic (...) (23 years ago, 9-Jan-02, to lugnet.build.mecha)
|
24 Messages in This Thread:
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|