Subject:
|
Re: Theft, Definitive statements vs shaping thoughts(was Re: 2001 Set info
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.admin.terms
|
Date:
|
Mon, 14 Aug 2000 10:50:41 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
5910 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.admin.terms, Mike Stanley writes:
> In lugnet.admin.terms, James Powell writes:
> > That is what I was meaning. I would hope LSI will put forward a policy
> > _suggestion_ for both here and RTL. I'd like to know where I am going to • stand
> > before I get steamrollered!
>
> Give it up - probably won't happen. Why should they do it anyway? If they
> define a policy to be [---] then they might somehow be bound to that, if for
> no other reason than PR. If they choose to simply remain silent, which is
> certainly their right to do since we're talking about their property, they
> stand to lose nothing because they can always just call in the dogs whenever
> they feel the need.
OK, am I to assume then that _anything_ I read on the web is fair game?
I'm going to need a 2nd Geocities account then!---to put stuff like this up on,
and link to.
(and await nasty legal threatening letters from)
http://www.geocities.com/MotorCity/Speedway/2049/LegoSWlist.html
James.
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
Message is in Reply To:
29 Messages in This Thread:
  
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
