Subject:
|
Re: 2001 Set info
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.admin.terms
|
Date:
|
Thu, 10 Aug 2000 00:45:58 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
5250 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.lego.direct, Todd Lehman writes:
> In lugnet.lego.direct, James Powell writes:
> > From the LUGNET Plan:
> >
> > 2.
> > To help people share information about LEGO products
> > and LEGO-related resources on the World Wide Web by
> > setting in motion a community-driven knowledge-base.
> >
> > Where in there does it say that something that a non-TLC employee cannot
> > distrbute info which he picked up by using a computer at work, instead of
> > by going for a walk down the isle with the lego in it?
>
> James,
> Above, as Mike Timm just pointed out, you quoted something which has
> absolutely nothing to do with the Terms and Conditions here or the Terms
> of Use Agreement. What you quoted was from a plan document -- a manifesto
> -- a public declaration of intentions. This is a historical document which
> is separate from the rules.
UM? Where did I say it was in the T&C, I believe right above it I said
_exactly_ where it came from. Is the above accurate? (I hope so), then it is
part and parcel of your site mandate.
Go to: www.lugnet.com/lego/direct/?n=522 to see exactly what I said. Either
what (Todd) wrote above is true, or (Todd) should get rid of it, or mark it as
being historic.(1)
I (and Jorge) agreed to the T&C that you (Todd) have decided on. I believe
that Jorge was within the T&C, and the above _madate_ of the site to post what
he did. I think that he found out info that anyone else could have, and if he
had not posted the SKU's, and that he was a employee of a company, that nothing
would have been said about the whole issue...I doubt LSI would even have
responded.---I guess if I ever come up with info that is like this it will make
me more sensitive as to editing the contents so that it cannot be considered
private info.--which defeats the whole argument LSI is trying to use.
James
(1) I'm putting (Todd) in there because I don't want any confusion.
|
|
Message has 2 Replies:
 | | Re: 2001 Set info
|
| (...) You did not say that it was in the T&C, and you did correctly identify its source. However, I did not say or imply that you thought or said or implied that it came from the T&C. What I said is that it has nothing to do with the T&C. It is not (...) (24 years ago, 10-Aug-00, to lugnet.admin.terms)
| | | Re: 2001 Set info
|
| (...) I have added a notice to the /admin/plan/ page which reads: Notice: This is a historical document which outlines site philosophy, motivations, directions, intentions, and so forth. This document does not have any bearing on or connection with (...) (24 years ago, 10-Aug-00, to lugnet.admin.terms)
|
29 Messages in This Thread:
  
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
